Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA needs & wishes

2007-01-29 Thread Steve Harris
On 29 Jan 2007, at 02:18, Fraser wrote: Hi Steve, Hi Fraser, Sure. This was an issue in LADSPA, though not a significant enough one that anyone wanted it changed. I would suspect you're overestimating the burden compared to the function call overhead and cache thrashing. I'd be interested t

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA needs & wishes

2007-01-29 Thread Chris Cannam
On Monday 29 Jan 2007 07:39, Nedko Arnaudov wrote: > Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > What are they? Do they do anything else, besides host LV2 plugins? > > I'm aware of these LV2 hosts: > * jack_host from libslv2 project, by Dave Robillard > * elven from ll-plugins project, by Lars

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA needs & wishes

2007-01-29 Thread Lars Luthman
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:49 +, Chris Cannam wrote: > On Monday 29 Jan 2007 07:39, Nedko Arnaudov wrote: > > Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What are they? Do they do anything else, besides host LV2 plugins? > > > > I'm aware of these LV2 hosts: > > * jack_host from libslv2 proj

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA needs & wishes

2007-01-29 Thread Steve Harris
On 29 Jan 2007, at 14:41, Lars Luthman wrote: On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 13:49 +, Chris Cannam wrote: On Monday 29 Jan 2007 07:39, Nedko Arnaudov wrote: Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: What are they? Do they do anything else, besides host LV2 plugins? I'm aware of these LV2 hosts:

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA needs & wishes

2007-01-29 Thread Paul Winkler
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 08:08:37AM +, Steve Harris wrote: > Ah, well the host is not supposed to change port values during run() > anyway, the idea in LADSPA (and LV2) is that the host should chop the > run() block where port values change. /delurk What does "chop the run block" mean? /

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA needs & wishes

2007-01-29 Thread Steve Harris
On 29 Jan 2007, at 15:23, Paul Winkler wrote: On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 08:08:37AM +, Steve Harris wrote: Ah, well the host is not supposed to change port values during run() anyway, the idea in LADSPA (and LV2) is that the host should chop the run() block where port values change. /delurk

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA needs & wishes

2007-01-29 Thread Lars Luthman
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 10:23 -0500, Paul Winkler wrote: > On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 08:08:37AM +, Steve Harris wrote: > > Ah, well the host is not supposed to change port values during run() > > anyway, the idea in LADSPA (and LV2) is that the host should chop the > > run() block where port v

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LV2 buffersize extensions (was: LADSPA...)

2007-01-29 Thread Florian Schmidt
On Monday 29 January 2007 09:08, Steve Harris wrote: > Ah, well the host is not supposed to change port values during run() > anyway, the idea in LADSPA (and LV2) is that the host should chop the > run() block where port values change. In practice not all hosts do > that, some just pick a suitably

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LV2 buffersize extensions (was: LADSPA...)

2007-01-29 Thread Steve Harris
On 29 Jan 2007, at 16:51, Florian Schmidt wrote: On Monday 29 January 2007 09:08, Steve Harris wrote: Ah, well the host is not supposed to change port values during run() anyway, the idea in LADSPA (and LV2) is that the host should chop the run() block where port values change. In practice no

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LV2 buffersize extensions (was: LADSPA...)

2007-01-29 Thread Florian Schmidt
On Monday 29 January 2007 18:22, Steve Harris wrote: > > http://tapas.affenbande.org/lv2/ext/fixed-buffersize > > http://tapas.affenbande.org/lv2/ext/power-of-two-buffersize > Great idea. I've got some plugins that will benefit a lot by this. We > should link to known extensions on the http://lv

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LV2 buffersize extensions (was: LADSPA...)

2007-01-29 Thread Steve Harris
On 29 Jan 2007, at 17:57, Florian Schmidt wrote: On Monday 29 January 2007 18:22, Steve Harris wrote: http://tapas.affenbande.org/lv2/ext/fixed-buffersize http://tapas.affenbande.org/lv2/ext/power-of-two-buffersize Great idea. I've got some plugins that will benefit a lot by this. We sh

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA needs & wishes

2007-01-29 Thread Nedko Arnaudov
Chris Cannam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is Zynjacku specific to Zyn in any way, or is it just named that way because > you wanted an LV2 host when you happened to be working on Zyn-based plugins? It is not specific. I loaded and produced sound with some of LV2 plugins From ll-plugins and with

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LV2 buffersize extensions (was: LADSPA...)

2007-01-29 Thread Dave Robillard
On Mon, 2007-01-29 at 17:22 +, Steve Harris wrote: > On 29 Jan 2007, at 16:51, Florian Schmidt wrote: > > > On Monday 29 January 2007 09:08, Steve Harris wrote: > > > >> Ah, well the host is not supposed to change port values during run() > >> anyway, the idea in LADSPA (and LV2) is that the h

Re: [linux-audio-dev] LADSPA needs & wishes

2007-01-29 Thread Fraser
Hi Steve, > Ah, well the host is not supposed to change port values during run() > anyway, the idea in LADSPA (and LV2) is that the host should chop the > run() block where port values change. In practice not all hosts do > that, some just pick a suitably small block size, eg. 32 frames and > qua

[linux-audio-dev] Usb audio problem

2007-01-29 Thread Bharat Singh GUSAIN
Hi all, I am trying to record audio from my STM webcam the driver for it's sound card's driver is loaded automatically as snd-usb-audio. But When I try to record through sound recorder, it did't record anything. On seeing at the catc traces I came to know that the sound recorder even don't set th