init and its direct children not audited?

2007-08-15 Thread Matthew Booth
I have the following in my test audit configuration on RHEL4 U5: -a entry,always -S exit -S exit_group -S execve -S fork -S vfork -S clone My first observation is that I've never seen an audit record with pid=1. It's fairly easy to reproduce this one. Log in at the console, then log out. You'll

[PATCH] Renumber AUDIT_TTY_[GS]ET

2007-08-15 Thread Miloslav Trmac
Renumber AUDIT_TTY_[GS]ET to avoid a conflict with netlink message types already used in the wild. From: Miloslav Trmac [EMAIL PROTECTED] Renumber AUDIT_TTY_[GS]ET to avoid a conflict with netlink message types already used in the wild. Signed-off-by: Miloslav Trmac [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---

Re: init and its direct children not audited?

2007-08-15 Thread Steve Grubb
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 10:51:21 Matthew Booth wrote: Does this ring any bells? Yes. Is there some other method of process creation I'm not aware of? Is init intentionally not audited, and if so, how do I audit it? You must have the audit=1 boot parameter to audit any process that is