Re: auditd fails to start on FC6 system, newer kernels effect?

2007-11-21 Thread Steve Grubb
Hi, Just a quick update on this in case any one was curious...turns out that the audit system was not in his kernel config. Its working now. -Steve On Monday 19 November 2007 01:23:25 pm Stephen Smalley wrote: On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 04:31 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote: Greetings; FC6

[RFC PATCH] New audit message for NetLabel static/fallback labels

2007-11-21 Thread Paul Moore
Those of you who follow the SELinux and/or LSM mailing lists know there is work currently underway to provide static or fallback network peer labels for use when traditional labeled networking (CIPSO or Labeled IPsec) is not present. For the same reasons that NetLabel or Labeled IPsec

Re: [RFC PATCH] New audit message for NetLabel static/fallback labels

2007-11-21 Thread Linda Knippers
Paul Moore wrote: Those of you who follow the SELinux and/or LSM mailing lists know there is work currently underway to provide static or fallback network peer labels for use when traditional labeled networking (CIPSO or Labeled IPsec) is not present. For the same reasons that NetLabel or

Missing audit information in xfrm_audit_common_policyinfo()?

2007-11-21 Thread Paul Moore
I just noticed that the IPsec auditing code does not appear to audit the netmask for the selector source and destination addresses in xfrm_audit_common_policyinfo(). Before I threw a patch together I thought I would check to see if there was a reason for this that I am missing ... -- paul

Re: [RFC PATCH] New audit message for NetLabel static/fallback labels

2007-11-21 Thread Paul Moore
On Wednesday 21 November 2007 4:26:57 pm Paul Moore wrote: On Wednesday 21 November 2007 4:21:26 pm Linda Knippers wrote: Paul Moore wrote: For reference, here are four examples of the new message types pulled from a Fedora Rawhide machine running this patch: * adding new fallback