Re: [PATCH 2/8] integrity: IMA as an integrity service provider

2009-03-09 Thread Mimi Zohar
On Fri, 2009-03-06 at 17:07 -0500, Eric Paris wrote: I'm very slow to the game, I know, but today was the first kernel that I built from linux-next with IMA on. I have a comment, and hopefully more to come np On Fri, 2009-02-06 at 14:52 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote: +void

integrity: audit

2009-03-09 Thread Mimi Zohar
The original patch added support to auditd for integrity messages, which are issued as a result of the integrity patchset that was applied to the security-testing-2.6/#next tree. This patch adds support for the new AUDIT_INTEGRITY_RULE message. Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar zo...@us.ibm.com Index:

Differentiating user activity from system activity

2009-03-09 Thread Matthew Booth
In the broadest possible sense, including definitions of 'user activity' and 'system activity', what schemes have people considered for the above? On other unixes, audit events have an associated 'terminal'. On the face of it, this seems like a reasonable differentiator. I.e. a 'user' process has