Re: [PATCH] mapping of reactions

2010-04-05 Thread LC Bruzenak
Now that you appear to have all supporting patches in place, would you mind sending out a sample of how to use this? It looks very interesting. Thx, LCB. -- LC (Lenny) Bruzenak le...@magitekltd.com -- Linux-audit mailing list Linux-audit@redhat.com

Re: [PATCH] mapping of reactions

2010-04-02 Thread Juraj Hlista
Hello, the code looks reasonable, some minor comments are below. I'll let Steve and others comment on the high-level design (just to point out a question, is it OK that auditctl will depend on sqlite?). Mirek Changes were applied according to the comments. I didn't look in detail,

Re: [PATCH] mapping of reactions

2010-03-31 Thread Miloslav Trmac
Hello, the code looks reasonable, some minor comments are below. I'll let Steve and others comment on the high-level design (just to point out a question, is it OK that auditctl will depend on sqlite?). Mirek - Juraj Hlista juro.hli...@gmail.com wrote: diff --git a/lib/libaudit.c

[PATCH] mapping of reactions

2010-03-30 Thread Juraj Hlista
From: Juraj Hlista juro.hli...@gmail.com Reactions are identified by numbers in the kernel, but user space requires string identifiers of reactions. That's why there must be some mapping from numbers to strings and vice versa. This is implemented using SQLite. A table where the reaction