On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 03:03:58PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> Hi Leon,
>
> On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 08:49:01AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:50:59PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > > +static inline bool task_is_in_root_ns(struct task_struct *tsk)
> >
> > It is
Hi Leon,
On Mon, Dec 06, 2021 at 08:49:01AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:50:59PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
[...]
> > +static inline bool task_is_in_root_ns(struct task_struct *tsk)
>
> It is bad that this name doesn't reflect PID nature of this namespace.
> Won't it
On Sun, Dec 05, 2021 at 10:50:59PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote:
> Currently the kernel uses open code in multiple places to check if a
> task is in the root PID namespace with the kind of format:
>
> if (task_active_pid_ns(current) == _pid_ns)
> do_something();
>
> This patch creates a new
Currently the kernel uses open code in multiple places to check if a
task is in the root PID namespace with the kind of format:
if (task_active_pid_ns(current) == _pid_ns)
do_something();
This patch creates a new helper function, task_is_in_root_ns(), it
returns true if a passed task is
