Re: [PATCH v13 26/25] Audit: Multiple LSM support in audit rules

2020-01-13 Thread Mimi Zohar
On Fri, 2020-01-10 at 11:40 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote: > On 1/9/2020 8:33 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > > Hi Casey, > > > > On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 10:53 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote: > >> With multiple possible security modules supporting audit rule > >> it is necessary to keep separate data for each

Re: [PATCH v13 26/25] Audit: Multiple LSM support in audit rules

2020-01-10 Thread Casey Schaufler
On 1/9/2020 8:33 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote: > Hi Casey, > > On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 10:53 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote: >> With multiple possible security modules supporting audit rule >> it is necessary to keep separate data for each module in the >> audit rules. This affects IMA as well, as it re-uses

Re: [PATCH v13 26/25] Audit: Multiple LSM support in audit rules

2020-01-09 Thread Mimi Zohar
Hi Casey, On Fri, 2020-01-03 at 10:53 -0800, Casey Schaufler wrote: > With multiple possible security modules supporting audit rule > it is necessary to keep separate data for each module in the > audit rules. This affects IMA as well, as it re-uses the audit > rule list mechanisms. While

[PATCH v13 26/25] Audit: Multiple LSM support in audit rules

2020-01-03 Thread Casey Schaufler
With multiple possible security modules supporting audit rule it is necessary to keep separate data for each module in the audit rules. This affects IMA as well, as it re-uses the audit rule list mechanisms. Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler Cc: linux-integr...@vger.kernel.org Cc: