Le Fri, 30 Nov 2012 12:44:54 -0500 (EST),
Miloslav Trmac m...@redhat.com a écrit :
- Original Message -
Le Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:05:19 -0500,
Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com a écrit :
On Friday, November 30, 2012 02:42:27 PM Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012
Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:21:55 -0500 (EST),
Miloslav Trmac m...@redhat.com a écrit :
FWIW, at least the attached patch was necessary to build with
--with-alpha --with-armeb. Mirek
I unfortunately still have a failure in the checks with both svn HEAD
and 2.2.1 when passing --with-armeb
On Friday, November 30, 2012 02:42:27 PM Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:21:55 -0500 (EST),
Miloslav Trmac m...@redhat.com a écrit :
FWIW, at least the attached patch was necessary to build with
--with-alpha --with-armeb. Mirek
I unfortunately still have a failure in
- Original Message -
Le Fri, 30 Nov 2012 09:05:19 -0500,
Steve Grubb sgr...@redhat.com a écrit :
On Friday, November 30, 2012 02:42:27 PM Laurent Bigonville wrote:
Le Mon, 26 Nov 2012 12:21:55 -0500 (EST),
Miloslav Trmac m...@redhat.com a écrit :
FWIW, at least the
- Original Message -
If I understand correctly it's only adding arch detection and syscall
tables to ausyscall. Why are these syscall table conditional?
To reduce the number of text relocations in libaudit. Libaudit links against a
number of applications and text relocations eats
On Monday, November 26, 2012 12:21:55 PM Miloslav Trmac wrote:
- Original Message -
If I understand correctly it's only adding arch detection and syscall
tables to ausyscall. Why are these syscall table conditional?
To reduce the number of text relocations in libaudit.
The issues with specific arm platforms has been fixed via a previous patch
in the SVN, thus the lines,
+ TEST_I2S((t[i].s[0] == 'i' t[i].s[1] = '4' t[i].s[1] = '6'
+ strcmp(t[i].s + 2, 86) == 0)
+|| strcmp(t[i].s, armv5tejl) == 0
+||
Hello,
I've several questions about the --with-alpha and --with-armeb
build-time flags.
1) are --with-alpha and --with-armeb intended to be enabled only on
these architectures on could they also be enabled on any other one? If
I understand correctly it's only adding arch detection and syscall
On Friday, November 16, 2012 06:00:56 PM Laurent Bigonville wrote:
I've several questions about the --with-alpha and --with-armeb
build-time flags.
1) are --with-alpha and --with-armeb intended to be enabled only on
these architectures on could they also be enabled on any other one?
If you
Steve is correct AFAIK regarding #2. I am unaware of the original meaning
for ARMEB, but functionality it must match the machine name returned by the
Linux Kernel. If --with-armeb is not used on ARM platforms, many audit
tools will return Machine Type Not Found or something similar. This has
been
10 matches
Mail list logo