On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:07 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 5:50 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 13, 2018 11:30:55 AM EST Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:25 AM Ondrej Mosnacek
> > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:19 PM Paul Moore
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 5:50 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 13, 2018 11:30:55 AM EST Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:25 AM Ondrej Mosnacek
> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:19 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:09 AM Ondrej Mosnacek
>
On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 11:50 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 13, 2018 11:30:55 AM EST Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:25 AM Ondrej Mosnacek
> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:19 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:09 AM Ondrej Mosnacek
>
On Tuesday, November 13, 2018 11:30:55 AM EST Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:25 AM Ondrej Mosnacek
wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:19 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:09 AM Ondrej Mosnacek
wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:30 AM Paul Moore
On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 10:25 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:19 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:09 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:30 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> > > > Let's reset this discussion a bit ... if we abolish relative
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 9:19 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:09 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:30 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> > > Let's reset this discussion a bit ... if we abolish relative paths and
> > > make everything absolute, is there even a need to log
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 3:09 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:30 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> > Let's reset this discussion a bit ... if we abolish relative paths and
> > make everything absolute, is there even a need to log PARENT?
>
> If there ever was such need, then this won't
On Tue, Nov 6, 2018 at 12:30 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:54 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:44 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 7:01 AM Ondrej Mosnacek
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 3:35 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> > >
On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 4:54 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:44 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 7:01 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 3:35 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:13 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> > > > > On
Sorry for the long-delayed reply, the SELinux world is keeping me
quite busy right now :)
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 5:44 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 7:01 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 3:35 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:13 AM Paul
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 7:01 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 3:35 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:13 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:58 AM Ondrej Mosnacek
> > > wrote:
> > > > Paul, could you please answer this question so I can
On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 3:35 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:13 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:58 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > > Paul, could you please answer this question so I can move forward? :)
> >
> > Yep, sorry for the delay ...
>
> I just went back
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 10:13 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:58 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > Paul, could you please answer this question so I can move forward? :)
>
> Yep, sorry for the delay ...
I just went back over the original problem, your proposed fix, and all
of the
On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 9:58 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> Paul, could you please answer this question so I can move forward? :)
Yep, sorry for the delay; there have been some serious bugs over in
SELinux land (as well as some employer related things that should be
public soon) that have taken my
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 3:00 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 4:09 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:08 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:24 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 7:45 AM Ondrej Mosnacek
> > > >
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 4:09 PM Paul Moore wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:08 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:24 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 7:45 AM Ondrej Mosnacek
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > When a relative path has just a single component
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 5:14 PM Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday, August 24, 2018 11:00:35 AM EDT Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 8:03 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 7:45 AM Ondrej Mosnacek
> wrote:
> > > > When a relative path has just a single component and we
On Friday, August 24, 2018 11:00:35 AM EDT Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 8:03 PM Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 7:45 AM Ondrej Mosnacek
wrote:
> > > When a relative path has just a single component and we want to emit a
> > > nametype=PARENT record, the current
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 8:03 PM Paul Moore wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 7:45 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > When a relative path has just a single component and we want to emit a
> > nametype=PARENT record, the current implementation just reports the full
> > CWD path (which is alrady
On Friday, August 24, 2018 8:59:10 AM EDT Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:45 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > When a relative path has just a single component and we want to emit a
> > nametype=PARENT record, the current implementation just reports the full
> > CWD path (which is
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 3:08 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:24 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 7:45 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> > >
> > > When a relative path has just a single component and we want to emit a
> > > nametype=PARENT record, the current
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:45 PM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> When a relative path has just a single component and we want to emit a
> nametype=PARENT record, the current implementation just reports the full
> CWD path (which is alrady available in the audit context).
>
> This is wrong for three
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:24 AM Paul Moore wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 7:45 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> >
> > When a relative path has just a single component and we want to emit a
> > nametype=PARENT record, the current implementation just reports the full
> > CWD path (which is alrady
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 7:45 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> When a relative path has just a single component and we want to emit a
> nametype=PARENT record, the current implementation just reports the full
> CWD path (which is alrady available in the audit context).
>
> This is wrong for three
On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 7:45 AM Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
>
> When a relative path has just a single component and we want to emit a
> nametype=PARENT record, the current implementation just reports the full
> CWD path (which is alrady available in the audit context).
>
> This is wrong for three
On 2018-08-02 13:44, Ondrej Mosnacek wrote:
> When a relative path has just a single component and we want to emit a
> nametype=PARENT record, the current implementation just reports the full
> CWD path (which is alrady available in the audit context).
>
> This is wrong for three reasons:
> 1.
26 matches
Mail list logo