On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 05:09:15PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 04:47:42 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:06:59AM -0400, Miloslav Trmac wrote:
- Original Message -
I am resurrecting this old thread from last summer because I ran
On Wednesday, March 13, 2013 10:55:29 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 05:09:15PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
On Tuesday, March 12, 2013 04:47:42 PM Richard Guy Briggs wrote:
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 07:06:59AM -0400, Miloslav Trmac wrote:
- Original Message -
- Original Message -
Please do post the patch here when you have it worked out as I am
very likely
to miss it in the flood of kernel patches when it goes to/from
Linus.
Here you go. Given Steve's good question, this control method may
change.
Isn't icanon _true_ when the data
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:43:58PM -0400, Miloslav Trmac wrote:
- Original Message -
Please do post the patch here when you have it worked out as I am
very likely
to miss it in the flood of kernel patches when it goes to/from
Linus.
Here you go. Given Steve's good
- Original Message -
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:43:58PM -0400, Miloslav Trmac wrote:
- Original Message -
Please do post the patch here when you have it worked out as I
am
very likely
to miss it in the flood of kernel patches when it goes to/from
Linus.
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 07:55:29AM PDT, Richard Guy Briggs spake thusly:
I haven't seen a lot of requests for this feature yet, but it sounds
like there could be a lot of interest, so it may be worth doing
correctly, rather than as a quick fix.
As people become more security-aware and