On Sat, 2016-08-13 at 09:29 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:23 AM, James Bottomley
> wrote:
> > It does? The race is the fact that the parent can be removed
> > before the child meaning if the parent name is re-registered before
> > the child dies we get a duplicate name
On Sat, Aug 13, 2016 at 8:23 AM, James Bottomley
wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 21:57 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Dan Williams <
>> dan.j.willi...@intel.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:17 PM, James Bottomley
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 14
On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 21:57 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Dan Williams <
> dan.j.willi...@intel.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 5:17 PM, James Bottomley
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2016-08-12 at 14:29 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > Before spending effort tr
Hello, Dan.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:29:30PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> Before spending effort trying to flush the destruction of old bdi
> instances before new ones are registered, is it rather time to
> complete the conversion of sd to only use dynamically allocated devt?
I think that proba
Hello.
On 8/12/2016 5:36 PM, Tom Yan wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index be9c76c..4e2d8e7 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -1204,14 +1204,26 @@ static int ata_scsi_dev_config(struct scsi_device
*sdev,
i