On Mon, 14 May 2018, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Since I'm using the same model and infrastructure for memory and IO
> load as well, IMO it makes more sense to present them in a coherent
> interface instead of trying to retrofit and change the loadavg file,
> which might not even be possible.
Well
On Mon, 7 May 2018, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> What to make of this number? If CPU utilization is at 100% and CPU
> pressure is 0, it means the system is perfectly utilized, with one
> runnable thread per CPU and nobody waiting. At two or more runnable
> tasks per CPU, the system is 100%
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> That approach may work well for your employer but sorry I don't think this is
> sufficient for an upstream driver. I think that most users who configure a
> network storage target expect full control over which storage devices are
> exported
> and
