Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible

Hi Artern, At 03/14/2018 05:07 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: On Wed, 2018-03-14 at 12:11 +0800, Dou Liyang wrote: At 03/13/2018 05:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Artem Bityutskiy Longer term, yeah, I agree. Kernel's notion of possible CPU count should

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible

Hi Artem, At 03/14/2018 11:29 AM, Dou Liyang wrote: Hi All, At 03/13/2018 05:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Artem Bityutskiy <dedeki...@gmail.com> wrote: On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 16:35 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: Then looks this issue need to fix by making po

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible

Hi Rafael, Thank you so much for your reply. At 03/13/2018 05:25 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 4:11 AM, Dou Liyang <douly.f...@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote: Hi Thomas, At 03/09/2018 11:08 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: [...] I'm not sure if there is a clear indicator w

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible

Hi All, At 03/13/2018 05:35 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 9:39 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: On Tue, 2018-03-13 at 16:35 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: Then looks this issue need to fix by making possible CPU count accurate because there are other resources

Re: [PATCH V3 0/4] genirq/affinity: irq vector spread among online CPUs as far as possible

Hi Thomas, At 03/09/2018 11:08 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: [...] I'm not sure if there is a clear indicator whether physcial hotplug is supported or not, but the ACPI folks (x86) and architecture maintainers +cc Rafael should be able to answer that question. I have a machine which says: