On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 04:56:28PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> How about renaming blk_mq_reinit_tagset() into blk_mq_tagset_iter() and
> to make the argument list of blk_mq_tagset_iter() more similar to that of
> blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter() such that callers of blk_mq_tagset_iter()
> can pass
On Thu, Aug 03, 2017 at 05:33:13PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Are you aware that the SCSI core already keeps track of the number of busy
> requests
> per LUN? See also the device_busy member of struct scsi_device. How about
> giving the
> block layer core access in some way to that counter?
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 09:44:59AM -0700, Scott Bauer wrote:
> > > +F:include/linux/sed*
> > > +F:include/uapi/linux/sed*
> >
> > Since this is in the block tree and is not nvme specific, could you use
> > linux-block as the main list?
>
> Sure, that's fine. Is there a way to denote "main list"
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 04:08:31PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> A typical Ethernet network adapter delays the generation of an interrupt
> after it has received a packet. A typical block device or HBA does not delay
> the generation of an interrupt that reports an I/O completion.
NVMe allows
