Hi Neil,
2016-11-24 5:47 GMT+01:00 NeilBrown :
> On Sat, Nov 19 2016, Jack Wang wrote:
>
>> 2016-11-18 6:16 GMT+01:00 NeilBrown :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been sitting on these patches for a while because although they
>>> solve a real problem, it is a fairly limited use-case, and I don't
>>> reall
On Sat, Nov 19 2016, Jack Wang wrote:
> 2016-11-18 6:16 GMT+01:00 NeilBrown :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been sitting on these patches for a while because although they
>> solve a real problem, it is a fairly limited use-case, and I don't
>> really like some of the details.
>>
>> So I'm posting them as
On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:16:11PM +1100, Neil Brown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been sitting on these patches for a while because although they
> solve a real problem, it is a fairly limited use-case, and I don't
> really like some of the details.
>
> So I'm posting them as RFC in the hope that a
2016-11-18 6:16 GMT+01:00 NeilBrown :
> Hi,
>
> I've been sitting on these patches for a while because although they
> solve a real problem, it is a fairly limited use-case, and I don't
> really like some of the details.
>
> So I'm posting them as RFC in the hope that a different perspective
>
(Seeing that it was me who initiated those patches I guess I should
speak up here)
On 11/18/2016 06:16 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been sitting on these patches for a while because although they
> solve a real problem, it is a fairly limited use-case, and I don't
> really like some of
Hi,
I've been sitting on these patches for a while because although they
solve a real problem, it is a fairly limited use-case, and I don't
really like some of the details.
So I'm posting them as RFC in the hope that a different perspective
might help me like them better, or find a better ap
