Hi Coly,
>On 2018/4/16 4:56 PM, tang.jun...@zte.com.cn wrote:
>> Hi Coly,
>>
>>> When backing device is offline, memory object pointed by dc->bdev might be
>>> released in some condititions. I have bug report that bdevname() triggers
>>> a NULL pointer deference panic inside bch_cached_dev_error(
On 2018/4/16 4:56 PM, tang.jun...@zte.com.cn wrote:
> Hi Coly,
>
>> When backing device is offline, memory object pointed by dc->bdev might be
>> released in some condititions. I have bug report that bdevname() triggers
>> a NULL pointer deference panic inside bch_cached_dev_error(), where
>> dc->
Hi Coly,
>When backing device is offline, memory object pointed by dc->bdev might be
>released in some condititions. I have bug report that bdevname() triggers
>a NULL pointer deference panic inside bch_cached_dev_error(), where
>dc->bdev is NULL.
>
>This patch adds char backing_dev_name[BDEVNAME_
When backing device is offline, memory object pointed by dc->bdev might be
released in some condititions. I have bug report that bdevname() triggers
a NULL pointer deference panic inside bch_cached_dev_error(), where
dc->bdev is NULL.
This patch adds char backing_dev_name[BDEVNAME_SIZE] in struct