On 7/9/18 7:03 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> In case of 'none' io scheduler, when hw queue isn't busy, it isn't
> necessary to enqueue request to sw queue and dequeue it from
> sw queue because request may be submitted to hw queue asap without
> extra cost, meantime there shouldn't be much request in sw qu
> Subject: [PATCH] blk-mq: issue directly if hw queue isn't busy in case
of 'none'
>
> In case of 'none' io scheduler, when hw queue isn't busy, it isn't
> necessary to enqueue request to sw queue and dequeue it from
> sw queue because request ma
In case of 'none' io scheduler, when hw queue isn't busy, it isn't
necessary to enqueue request to sw queue and dequeue it from
sw queue because request may be submitted to hw queue asap without
extra cost, meantime there shouldn't be much request in sw queue,
and we don't need to worry about effec
