Hi!
> I talked to Pavel a bit back and it turns out he has a
> usecase for BFQ as well and I bet he also would like it
> as default scheduler for that system (Pavel tell us more,
> I don't remember what it was!)
I'm not sure I remember clearly, either.
IIRC I was working with ionice on spinning
> Il giorno 02 ott 2018, alle ore 14:43, Linus Walleij
> ha scritto:
>
> This sets BFQ as the default scheduler for single queue
> block devices (nr_hw_queues == 1) if it is available. This
> affects notably MMC/SD-cards but notably also UBI and
> the loopback device.
>
> I have been
Linus,
Am Dienstag, 2. Oktober 2018, 14:43:29 CEST schrieb Linus Walleij:
> This sets BFQ as the default scheduler for single queue
> block devices (nr_hw_queues == 1) if it is available. This
> affects notably MMC/SD-cards but notably also UBI and
> the loopback device.
did you notice a
On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 4:31 PM Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 10/2/18 6:43 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > This sets BFQ as the default scheduler for single queue
> > block devices (nr_hw_queues == 1) if it is available. This
> > affects notably MMC/SD-cards but notably also UBI and
> > the loopback
On 10/2/18 6:43 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> This sets BFQ as the default scheduler for single queue
> block devices (nr_hw_queues == 1) if it is available. This
> affects notably MMC/SD-cards but notably also UBI and
> the loopback device.
>
> I have been running it for a while without any
This sets BFQ as the default scheduler for single queue
block devices (nr_hw_queues == 1) if it is available. This
affects notably MMC/SD-cards but notably also UBI and
the loopback device.
I have been running it for a while without any negative
effects on my pet systems and I want some wider
