On 2/12/18 10:14 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> It seems that the proper value to return in this particular case is the
> one contained into variable new_index instead of ret.
Thanks, applied.
--
Jens Axboe
On 02/26/2018 05:01 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:14:55AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
It seems that the proper value to return in this particular case is the
one contained into variable new_index instead of ret.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1465148 ("Copy-paste error")
On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 11:14:55AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> It seems that the proper value to return in this particular case is the
> one contained into variable new_index instead of ret.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1465148 ("Copy-paste error")
> Fixes: e46c7287b1c2 ("nbd: add a basic
It seems that the proper value to return in this particular case is the
one contained into variable new_index instead of ret.
Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1465148 ("Copy-paste error")
Fixes: e46c7287b1c2 ("nbd: add a basic netlink interface")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva