On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 12:07:08PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:45:29AM -0700, Scott Bauer wrote:
> > > + if (check_opal_support(dev) < 0) {
> > > pr_warn("Opal is not supported on this device\n");
> > > - opal_dev->initialized = true;
> > > +
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 11:58:12PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I'd rather prefer to make the structure separately allocated as
> discussed before. Scott, can you test the patch below? I'm not near
> my devices I could test on.
>
> ---
> From b2cda0c7ec5c0ec66582655751838f519cfa1706 Mon
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:37:55AM -0700, Scott Bauer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:18:59AM -0700, Jon Derrick wrote:
> > It looks good to me at first glance but I can't apply it. What tree are
> > you on?
> >
> > On 02/16/2017 12:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > I'd rather prefer to
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:18:59AM -0700, Jon Derrick wrote:
> It looks good to me at first glance but I can't apply it. What tree are
> you on?
>
> On 02/16/2017 12:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > I'd rather prefer to make the structure separately allocated as
> > discussed before. Scott,
It looks good to me at first glance but I can't apply it. What tree are
you on?
On 02/16/2017 12:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> I'd rather prefer to make the structure separately allocated as
> discussed before. Scott, can you test the patch below? I'm not near
> my devices I could test on.
I'd rather prefer to make the structure separately allocated as
discussed before. Scott, can you test the patch below? I'm not near
my devices I could test on.
---
>From b2cda0c7ec5c0ec66582655751838f519cfa1706 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Thu, 16 Feb
On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 07:16:27PM -0500, Keith Busch wrote:
> No need to use space if it can't be used. This reduces the size of struct
> nvme_ctrl by a little over 4k when CONFIG_BLK_SED_OPAL is not set.
>
> Signed-off-by: Keith Busch
> ---
> include/linux/sed-opal.h |