Since commit 23688bf4f830 ("block: ensure to split after potentially
bouncing a bio") blk_queue_bounce() is called *before*
blk_queue_split().
This means that:
1/ the comments blk_queue_split() about bounce buffers are
irrelevant, and
2/ a very large bio (more than BIO_MAX_PAGES) will no long
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 01:42:24PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> Since commit 23688bf4f830 ("block: ensure to split after potentially
> bouncing a bio") blk_queue_bounce() is called *before*
> blk_queue_split().
> This means that:
> 1/ the comments blk_queue_split() about bounce buffers are
> irre
Looks fine,
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig
although I think we really should kill off the block level bouncing
rather sooner than later.
Since commit 23688bf4f830 ("block: ensure to split after potentially
bouncing a bio") blk_queue_bounce() is called *before*
blk_queue_split().
This means that:
1/ the comments blk_queue_split() about bounce buffers are
irrelevant, and
2/ a very large bio (more than BIO_MAX_PAGES) will no long
