Calling loop_reread_partitions() under loop_ctl_mutex causes lockdep to
complain about circular lock dependency between bdev->bd_mutex and
lo->lo_ctl_mutex. The problem is that on loop device open or close
lo_open() and lo_release() get called with bdev->bd_mutex held and they
need to acquire loop_ctl_mutex. OTOH when loop_reread_partitions() is
called with loop_ctl_mutex held, it will call blkdev_reread_part() which
acquires bdev->bd_mutex. See syzbot report for details [1].

Move all calls of loop_rescan_partitions() out of loop_ctl_mutex to
avoid lockdep warning and fix deadlock possibility.

[1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=bf154052f0eea4bc7712499e4569505907d1588

Reported-by: syzbot 
<syzbot+4684a000d5abdade83fac55b1e7d1f935ef19...@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
---
 drivers/block/loop.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/loop.c b/drivers/block/loop.c
index f1d7a4fe30fc..cce5d4e8e863 100644
--- a/drivers/block/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/block/loop.c
@@ -679,6 +679,7 @@ static int loop_change_fd(struct loop_device *lo, struct 
block_device *bdev,
 {
        struct file     *file, *old_file;
        int             error;
+       bool            partscan;
 
        error = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&loop_ctl_mutex, 1);
        if (error)
@@ -720,9 +721,10 @@ static int loop_change_fd(struct loop_device *lo, struct 
block_device *bdev,
        blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(lo->lo_queue);
 
        fput(old_file);
-       if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)
-               loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
+       partscan = lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
        mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
+       if (partscan)
+               loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
        return 0;
 
 out_putf:
@@ -903,6 +905,7 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_device *lo, fmode_t mode,
        int             lo_flags = 0;
        int             error;
        loff_t          size;
+       bool            partscan;
 
        /* This is safe, since we have a reference from open(). */
        __module_get(THIS_MODULE);
@@ -969,14 +972,15 @@ static int loop_set_fd(struct loop_device *lo, fmode_t 
mode,
        lo->lo_state = Lo_bound;
        if (part_shift)
                lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
-       if (lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)
-               loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
+       partscan = lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
 
        /* Grab the block_device to prevent its destruction after we
         * put /dev/loopXX inode. Later in __loop_clr_fd() we bdput(bdev).
         */
        bdgrab(bdev);
        mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
+       if (partscan)
+               loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
        return 0;
 
 out_unlock:
@@ -1157,6 +1161,8 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct 
loop_info64 *info)
        int err;
        struct loop_func_table *xfer;
        kuid_t uid = current_uid();
+       struct block_device *bdev;
+       bool partscan = false;
 
        err = mutex_lock_killable_nested(&loop_ctl_mutex, 1);
        if (err)
@@ -1245,10 +1251,13 @@ loop_set_status(struct loop_device *lo, const struct 
loop_info64 *info)
             !(lo->lo_flags & LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN)) {
                lo->lo_flags |= LO_FLAGS_PARTSCAN;
                lo->lo_disk->flags &= ~GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN;
-               loop_reread_partitions(lo, lo->lo_device);
+               bdev = lo->lo_device;
+               partscan = true;
        }
 out_unlock:
        mutex_unlock(&loop_ctl_mutex);
+       if (partscan)
+               loop_reread_partitions(lo, bdev);
 
        return err;
 }
-- 
2.16.4

Reply via email to