[...]
> +
> +enum mmc_issued mmc_blk_mq_issue_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request
> *req)
> +{
> + struct mmc_blk_data *md = mq->blkdata;
> + struct mmc_card *card = md->queue.card;
> + struct mmc_host *host = card->host;
> + int ret;
>>
On 27/11/17 13:23, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 27 November 2017 at 11:20, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 24/11/17 12:12, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>
+/* Single sector read during recovery */
+static void mmc_blk_ss_read(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
>>>
>>> Nitpick: I think mmc
+ Jens, Paolo
[...]
>>> +static int mmc_blk_mq_issue_rw_rq(struct mmc_queue *mq,
>>> + struct request *req)
>>> +{
>>> + struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq = req_to_mmc_queue_req(req);
>>> + struct mmc_host *host = mq->card->host;
>>> + struct request *pr
On 27 November 2017 at 11:20, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 24/11/17 12:12, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> +/* Single sector read during recovery */
>>> +static void mmc_blk_ss_read(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
>>
>> Nitpick: I think mmc_blk_read_single() would be better as it is a m
On 24/11/17 12:12, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
>
>> +/* Single sector read during recovery */
>> +static void mmc_blk_ss_read(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
>
> Nitpick: I think mmc_blk_read_single() would be better as it is a more
> clear name. Would you mind changing it?
>
>> +{
>>
[...]
> +/* Single sector read during recovery */
> +static void mmc_blk_ss_read(struct mmc_queue *mq, struct request *req)
Nitpick: I think mmc_blk_read_single() would be better as it is a more
clear name. Would you mind changing it?
> +{
> + struct mmc_queue_req *mqrq = req_to_mmc_queue_
Define and use a blk-mq queue. Discards and flushes are processed
synchronously, but reads and writes asynchronously. In order to support
slow DMA unmapping, DMA unmapping is not done until after the next request
is started. That means the request is not completed until then. If there is
no next re
