On 12/13/2016 09:28 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> No worries, ask away if you have questions. As you might have seen, it's
>>> still a little bit of a moving target, but it's getting closer every
>>> day. I'll post a v3 later today hopefully that will be a good fix point
>>> for you. I'll need to add
On 12/13/2016 09:15 AM, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
>> Il giorno 13 dic 2016, alle ore 16:17, Jens Axboe ha scritto:
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 13 2016, Paolo Valente wrote:
>>>
Il giorno 08 dic 2016, alle ore 21:13, Jens Axboe ha
scritto:
As a followup to
On Tue, Dec 13 2016, Paolo Valente wrote:
>
> > Il giorno 08 dic 2016, alle ore 21:13, Jens Axboe ha scritto:
> >
> > As a followup to this posting from yesterday:
> >
> > https://marc.info/?l=linux-block=148115232806065=2
> >
> > this is version 2. I wanted to post a new one
> Il giorno 08 dic 2016, alle ore 21:13, Jens Axboe ha scritto:
>
> As a followup to this posting from yesterday:
>
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-block=148115232806065=2
>
> this is version 2. I wanted to post a new one fairly quickly, as there
> ended up being a number of
As a followup to this posting from yesterday:
https://marc.info/?l=linux-block=148115232806065=2
this is version 2. I wanted to post a new one fairly quickly, as there
ended up being a number of potential crashes in v1. This one should be
solid, I've run mq-deadline on both NVMe and regular