Re: [PATCHSET/RFC v2] blk-mq scheduling framework

2016-12-13 Thread Jens Axboe
On 12/13/2016 09:28 AM, Jens Axboe wrote: >>> No worries, ask away if you have questions. As you might have seen, it's >>> still a little bit of a moving target, but it's getting closer every >>> day. I'll post a v3 later today hopefully that will be a good fix point >>> for you. I'll need to add

Re: [PATCHSET/RFC v2] blk-mq scheduling framework

2016-12-13 Thread Jens Axboe
On 12/13/2016 09:15 AM, Paolo Valente wrote: > >> Il giorno 13 dic 2016, alle ore 16:17, Jens Axboe ha scritto: >> >> On Tue, Dec 13 2016, Paolo Valente wrote: >>> Il giorno 08 dic 2016, alle ore 21:13, Jens Axboe ha scritto: As a followup to

Re: [PATCHSET/RFC v2] blk-mq scheduling framework

2016-12-13 Thread Jens Axboe
On Tue, Dec 13 2016, Paolo Valente wrote: > > > Il giorno 08 dic 2016, alle ore 21:13, Jens Axboe ha scritto: > > > > As a followup to this posting from yesterday: > > > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-block=148115232806065=2 > > > > this is version 2. I wanted to post a new one

Re: [PATCHSET/RFC v2] blk-mq scheduling framework

2016-12-13 Thread Paolo Valente
> Il giorno 08 dic 2016, alle ore 21:13, Jens Axboe ha scritto: > > As a followup to this posting from yesterday: > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-block=148115232806065=2 > > this is version 2. I wanted to post a new one fairly quickly, as there > ended up being a number of

[PATCHSET/RFC v2] blk-mq scheduling framework

2016-12-08 Thread Jens Axboe
As a followup to this posting from yesterday: https://marc.info/?l=linux-block=148115232806065=2 this is version 2. I wanted to post a new one fairly quickly, as there ended up being a number of potential crashes in v1. This one should be solid, I've run mq-deadline on both NVMe and regular