On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 18:13 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15 2018 at 6:10P -0500,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 15 2018 at 5:51pm -0500,
> > Bart Van Assche wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 17:15 -0500, Mike Snitzer
On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 7:13 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15 2018 at 6:10P -0500,
> Mike Snitzer wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 15 2018 at 5:51pm -0500,
>> Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 17:15 -0500, Mike
On Mon, Jan 15 2018 at 6:10P -0500,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 15 2018 at 5:51pm -0500,
> Bart Van Assche wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 17:15 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > > sysfs write op calls kernfs_fop_write which takes:
> > >
On Mon, Jan 15 2018 at 5:51pm -0500,
Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 17:15 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > sysfs write op calls kernfs_fop_write which takes:
> > of->mutex then kn->count#213 (no idea what that is)
> > then q->sysfs_lock (via
On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 17:15 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> sysfs write op calls kernfs_fop_write which takes:
> of->mutex then kn->count#213 (no idea what that is)
> then q->sysfs_lock (via queue_attr_store)
>
> vs
>
> blk_unregister_queue takes:
> q->sysfs_lock then
> kernfs_mutex (via
On Mon, Jan 15 2018 at 12:16pm -0500,
Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 10:06 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > I'm submitting this v5 with more feeling now ;)
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> Have these patches been tested with lockdep enabled? The following appeared in
>
On Mon, Jan 15 2018 at 12:51pm -0500,
Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 12:48 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > Do I need to do something more to enable lockdep aside from set
> > CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT=y ?
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> I think you also need to set
On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 12:48 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> Do I need to do something more to enable lockdep aside from set
> CONFIG_LOCKDEP_SUPPORT=y ?
Hello Mike,
I think you also need to set CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y.
Bart.
On Mon, Jan 15 2018 at 12:36pm -0500,
Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 12:29 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > So you replied to v5, I emailed a v6 out for the relevant patch. Just
> > want to make sure you're testing with either Jens' latest tree or are
> >
On Mon, 2018-01-15 at 12:29 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> So you replied to v5, I emailed a v6 out for the relevant patch. Just
> want to make sure you're testing with either Jens' latest tree or are
> using my v6 that fixed blk_mq_unregister_dev() to require caller holds
> q->sysfs_lock ?
Hello
On Mon, Jan 15 2018 at 12:16pm -0500,
Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 10:06 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> > I'm submitting this v5 with more feeling now ;)
>
> Hello Mike,
>
> Have these patches been tested with lockdep enabled? The following appeared in
>
On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 10:06 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> I'm submitting this v5 with more feeling now ;)
Hello Mike,
Have these patches been tested with lockdep enabled? The following appeared in
the kernel log when after I started testing Jens' for-next tree of this morning:
Hi Jens,
I'm submitting this v5 with more feeling now ;)
I've distilled the changes down to be quite minimal. Hopefully this
will help you and others review.
I've also done a dry-run of applying 4.16 block changes and then
merging dm-4.16; no merge conflicts:
13 matches
Mail list logo