On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 03:32:05PM -0700, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> XFS by default does metadata csums. But ext4 doesn't use it for either
> metadata or the journal by default still, it is still optional. So for
> now it mainly benefits XFS.
Metadata checksums are enabled by default in the version
On Nov 15, 2017, at 7:18 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
> [Background]
> Recently I'm considering the possibility to use checksum from filesystem
> to enhance device-mapper raid.
>
> The idea behind it is quite simple, since most modern filesystems have
> checksum for their
On 2017-11-16 20:30, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2017年11月17日 00:47, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
This is at least less complicated than dm-integrity.
Just a new hook for READ bio. And it can start from easy part.
Like starting from dm-raid1 and other fs support.
It's less complicated for end users
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:54 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> The user doesn't have to setup dm-verity to get this.
Or dm-integrity, rather.
--
Chris Murphy
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 6:22 PM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年11月17日 06:32, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> It's good the file system can stay alive, but data is the much
>> bigger target in terms of percent space on the physical media,
>
> It's also true.
> (Although working
On 2017年11月17日 00:47, Austin S. Hemmelgarn wrote:
>>
>> This is at least less complicated than dm-integrity.
>>
>> Just a new hook for READ bio. And it can start from easy part.
>> Like starting from dm-raid1 and other fs support.
> It's less complicated for end users (in theory, but cryptsetup
On 2017年11月17日 06:32, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>> For example, if we use the following device mapper layout:
>>
>> FS (can be any fs with metadata csum)
>> |
>> dm-integrity
>>
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 3:04 AM, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> For example, if we use the following device mapper layout:
>
> FS (can be any fs with metadata csum)
> |
> dm-integrity
> |
> dm-raid1
>/
On 2017-11-16 09:06, Qu Wenruo wrote:
On 2017年11月16日 20:33, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Dne 16.11.2017 v 11:04 Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
On 2017年11月16日 17:43, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Dne 16.11.2017 v 09:08 Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
[What we have]
The nearest infrastructure I found in kernel is
On 2017年11月16日 20:33, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Dne 16.11.2017 v 11:04 Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
>>
>>
>> On 2017年11月16日 17:43, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
>>> Dne 16.11.2017 v 09:08 Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
>
[What we have]
The nearest infrastructure I found in kernel is
On 2017-11-16 07:33, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Dne 16.11.2017 v 11:04 Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
On 2017年11月16日 17:43, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Dne 16.11.2017 v 09:08 Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
[What we have]
The nearest infrastructure I found in kernel is
bio_integrity_payload.
Hi
We already have
Dne 16.11.2017 v 11:04 Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
On 2017年11月16日 17:43, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
Dne 16.11.2017 v 09:08 Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
[What we have]
The nearest infrastructure I found in kernel is
bio_integrity_payload.
Hi
We already have dm-integrity target upstream.
What's missing
On 2017年11月16日 17:43, Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
> Dne 16.11.2017 v 09:08 Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
>>
>>
>>>
>> [What we have]
>> The nearest infrastructure I found in kernel is
>> bio_integrity_payload.
>>
>
> Hi
>
> We already have dm-integrity target upstream.
> What's missing
Dne 16.11.2017 v 09:08 Qu Wenruo napsal(a):
[What we have]
The nearest infrastructure I found in kernel is bio_integrity_payload.
Hi
We already have dm-integrity target upstream.
What's missing in this target ?
Regards
Zdenek
On 2017年11月16日 15:42, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 16.11.2017 09:38, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2017年11月16日 14:54, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16.11.2017 04:18, Qu Wenruo wrote:
Hi all,
[Background]
Recently I'm considering the possibility to use checksum
On 16.11.2017 09:38, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>
>
> On 2017年11月16日 14:54, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 16.11.2017 04:18, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> [Background]
>>> Recently I'm considering the possibility to use checksum from filesystem
>>> to enhance device-mapper raid.
>>>
>>> The
On 2017年11月16日 14:54, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>
>
> On 16.11.2017 04:18, Qu Wenruo wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> [Background]
>> Recently I'm considering the possibility to use checksum from filesystem
>> to enhance device-mapper raid.
>>
>> The idea behind it is quite simple, since most modern
On 16.11.2017 04:18, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [Background]
> Recently I'm considering the possibility to use checksum from filesystem
> to enhance device-mapper raid.
>
> The idea behind it is quite simple, since most modern filesystems have
> checksum for their metadata, and even some
Hi all,
[Background]
Recently I'm considering the possibility to use checksum from filesystem
to enhance device-mapper raid.
The idea behind it is quite simple, since most modern filesystems have
checksum for their metadata, and even some (btrfs) have checksum for data.
And for btrfs RAID1/10
19 matches
Mail list logo