On 2017/9/5 下午2:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 01:30:04AM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
>>
>> When you mentioned "whole chunk of code", do you mean the following
>> block of code ?
>>
>>
>> 1960 if (IS_ERR(bdev)) {
>> = start of whole chunk of code
>>
Hi Shaohua,
On 17/9/6 05:02, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:24:23AM +0200, Paolo VALENTE wrote:
>>
>>> Il giorno 15 gen 2017, alle ore 04:42, Shaohua Li ha scritto:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> cgroup still lacks a good iocontroller. CFQ works well for hard disk, but
>>> not
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 09:24:49AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 03:18:51PM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 08:06:31AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:00:26AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > On 09/05/2017 01:37 AM, Chandan
On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 08:06:31AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:00:26AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 09/05/2017 01:37 AM, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 12:12:08 PM IST Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > >> On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 11:31:39PM -0700,
On 9/5/17 5:10 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:17:42AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 9/5/17 1:44 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 11:31:39PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:14:42AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 09:00:26AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 09/05/2017 01:37 AM, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 12:12:08 PM IST Omar Sandoval wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 11:31:39PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:14:42AM
From: Omar Sandoval
Commit 6c6b6f28b333 ("loop: set physical block size to PAGE_SIZE")
caused mkfs.xfs to barf on ppc64 [1]. Always using PAGE_SIZE as the
physical block size still makes the most sense semantically, but let's
just lie and always set it to the same value as the
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 09:24:23AM +0200, Paolo VALENTE wrote:
>
> > Il giorno 15 gen 2017, alle ore 04:42, Shaohua Li ha scritto:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > cgroup still lacks a good iocontroller. CFQ works well for hard disk, but
> > not
> > much for SSD. This patch set try to add a
On 5 September 2017 at 10:10, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 05/09/17 10:24, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>
> I can send blk-mq support for legacy requests in a few days if you like,
> but
> I want to hear a better explanation of why you are delaying CQE
On 09/05/2017 01:37 AM, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 12:12:08 PM IST Omar Sandoval wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 11:31:39PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:14:42AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
Linux kernel commit
Hi Linus,
This is the first pull request for 4.14, containing most of the code
changes. It's a quiet series this round, which I think we needed after
the churn of the last few series. This pull request contains:
- Fix for a registration race in loop, from Anton Volkov.
- Overflow complaint fix
Hello,
Since gmane.org is no longer operational linux-block messages are no longer
archived. I think it's useful to archive linux-block messages because it
makes it possible to review past discussions, especially for people who are
not subscribed to the list. How about activating archival by
On 9/5/17 1:44 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 11:31:39PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:14:42AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
>>> Linux kernel commit 6c6b6f28b3335fd85ec833ee0005d9c9dca6c003 (loop: set
>>> physical block size to PAGE_SIZE) now
On Tue, 2017-09-05 at 09:56 +0200, Paolo Valente wrote:
> Ok, my suspects seem confirmed: the path dm_mq_queue_rq -> map_request
> -> setup_clone -> blk_rq_prep_clone creates a cloned request without
> invoking e->type->ops.mq.prepare_request for the target elevator e.
> The cloned request is
On 05/09/17 10:24, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> [...]
>
I can send blk-mq support for legacy requests in a few days if you like,
but
I want to hear a better explanation of why you are delaying CQE support.
>>>
>>> That would be very nice, however be aware of that we are in the merge
On Tuesday, September 5, 2017 12:12:08 PM IST Omar Sandoval wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 11:31:39PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 11:14:42AM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote:
> > > Linux kernel commit 6c6b6f28b3335fd85ec833ee0005d9c9dca6c003 (loop: set
> > > physical
[...]
>>>
>>> I can send blk-mq support for legacy requests in a few days if you like, but
>>> I want to hear a better explanation of why you are delaying CQE support.
>>
>> That would be very nice, however be aware of that we are in the merge
>> window, so I am not picking new material for 4.14
On 2017/9/5 下午2:43, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 01:30:04AM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
>>
>> When you mentioned "whole chunk of code", do you mean the following
>> block of code ?
>>
>>
>> 1960 if (IS_ERR(bdev)) {
>> = start of whole chunk of code
>>
On Tue, Sep 05, 2017 at 01:30:04AM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
>
> When you mentioned "whole chunk of code", do you mean the following
> block of code ?
>
>
> 1960 if (IS_ERR(bdev)) {
> = start of whole chunk of code
> 1961 if (bdev == ERR_PTR(-EBUSY)) {
>
19 matches
Mail list logo