Re: [PATCH v2] block: BFQ default for single queue devices

On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 07:48:33AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 10/17/18 3:05 AM, Jan Kara wrote: > > Well, the problem with this is that big distro people really don't care > > much because they already use udev for tuning the IO scheduler. So whatever > > defaults the kernel is going to

Re: [PATCH 00/14] introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra scheduler

On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 08:17:01AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 10/28/2016 12:36 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > You have been pushing Paolo in different directions throughout the > > years with his work in BFQ, wasting lots of his time/effort. > I have not. Various entities have advised Paolo

Re: [PATCH 00/14] introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra scheduler

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:21:06PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 10/27/2016 12:13 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > I can imagine, that it's not always a straight forward "convert to blk > > mq" patch for every block device driver. > Well, I've actually done a few conversions, and it's not difficult at

Re: [PATCH V3 00/11] block-throttle: add .high limit

On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 10:04:41AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > I get that bfq can be a good compromise on most desktop workloads and > > behave reasonably well for some server workloads with the slice > > expiration