On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 05:35:07PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > Hmm. I think we need to avoid clearing that data and update it using
> > RCU instead. Calling blk_queue_enter before submitting bios is
> > something that would make zone reporting very different from any
> > other block layer
Christoph,
On 2018/04/17 8:18, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 06:00:34PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>> This patch on itself does not change the behavior of either ioctl.
>> However, this patch is necessary to avoid that these ioctls fail
>> with -EIO if sd_revalidate_disk()
On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 17:18 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 06:00:34PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > This patch on itself does not change the behavior of either ioctl.
> > However, this patch is necessary to avoid that these ioctls fail
> > with -EIO if
On Tue, 2018-04-17 at 17:18 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 06:00:34PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > This patch on itself does not change the behavior of either ioctl.
> > However, this patch is necessary to avoid that these ioctls fail
> > with -EIO if
On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 06:00:34PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> This patch on itself does not change the behavior of either ioctl.
> However, this patch is necessary to avoid that these ioctls fail
> with -EIO if sd_revalidate_disk() is called while these ioctls are
> in progress because the
This patch on itself does not change the behavior of either ioctl.
However, this patch is necessary to avoid that these ioctls fail
with -EIO if sd_revalidate_disk() is called while these ioctls are
in progress because the current zoned block command code temporarily
clears data that is needed by
