On 06/15/2017 02:17 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 09:45:04PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> No functional changes in this patch, just in preparation for
>> allowing applications to pass in hints about data life times
>> for writes.
>>
>> Pack the i_write_hint field into a 2-by
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 09:45:04PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> No functional changes in this patch, just in preparation for
> allowing applications to pass in hints about data life times
> for writes.
>
> Pack the i_write_hint field into a 2-byte hole, so we don't grow
> the size of the inode.
A u
No functional changes in this patch, just in preparation for
allowing applications to pass in hints about data life times
for writes.
Pack the i_write_hint field into a 2-byte hole, so we don't grow
the size of the inode.
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe
---
fs/inode.c
On 06/14/2017 02:25 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 01:05:26PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> No functional changes in this patch, just in preparation for
>> allowing applications to pass in hints about data life times
>> for writes.
>>
>> Pack the i_stream field into a 2-byte h
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 01:05:26PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> No functional changes in this patch, just in preparation for
> allowing applications to pass in hints about data life times
> for writes.
>
> Pack the i_stream field into a 2-byte hole, so we don't grow
> the size of the inode.
Can't w
No functional changes in this patch, just in preparation for
allowing applications to pass in hints about data life times
for writes.
Pack the i_stream field into a 2-byte hole, so we don't grow
the size of the inode.
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe
---
fs/inode.c
