On Thu 09-02-17 16:36:13, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
> On 02/02/2017 07:34 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > So far we just relied on block device to hold a bdi reference for us
> > while the filesystem is mounted. While that works perfectly fine, it is
> > a bit awkward that we have a pointer to a refcounted
On 02/02/2017 07:34 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> So far we just relied on block device to hold a bdi reference for us
> while the filesystem is mounted. While that works perfectly fine, it is
> a bit awkward that we have a pointer to a refcounted structure in the
> superblock without proper reference. So
So far we just relied on block device to hold a bdi reference for us
while the filesystem is mounted. While that works perfectly fine, it is
a bit awkward that we have a pointer to a refcounted structure in the
superblock without proper reference. So make s_bdi hold a proper
reference to block
