Currently the removal from bdi->wb_list happens directly in
cgwb_release_workfn(). Move it to wb_shutdown() which is functionally
equivalent and more logical (the list gets only used for distributing
writeback works among bdi_writeback structures). It will also allow us
to simplify writeback shutdown in cgwb_bdi_destroy().
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
---
mm/backing-dev.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index d7aaf2517c30..54b9e934eef4 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -345,6 +345,8 @@ static int wb_init(struct bdi_writeback *wb, struct
backing_dev_info *bdi,
return err;
}
+static void cgwb_remove_from_bdi_list(struct bdi_writeback *wb);
+
/*
* Remove bdi from the global list and shutdown any threads we have running
*/
@@ -358,6 +360,7 @@ static void wb_shutdown(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
}
spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
+ cgwb_remove_from_bdi_list(wb);
/*
* Drain work list and shutdown the delayed_work. !WB_registered
* tells wb_workfn() that @wb is dying and its work_list needs to
@@ -491,10 +494,6 @@ static void cgwb_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
release_work);
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = wb->bdi;
- spin_lock_irq(&cgwb_lock);
- list_del_rcu(&wb->bdi_node);
- spin_unlock_irq(&cgwb_lock);
-
wb_shutdown(wb);
css_put(wb->memcg_css);
@@ -526,6 +525,13 @@ static void cgwb_kill(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
percpu_ref_kill(&wb->refcnt);
}
+static void cgwb_remove_from_bdi_list(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
+{
+ spin_lock_irq(&cgwb_lock);
+ list_del_rcu(&wb->bdi_node);
+ spin_unlock_irq(&cgwb_lock);
+}
+
static int cgwb_create(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
struct cgroup_subsys_state *memcg_css, gfp_t gfp)
{
@@ -776,6 +782,8 @@ static int cgwb_bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
return 0;
}
+static void cgwb_remove_from_bdi_list(struct bdi_writeback *wb) { }
+
static void cgwb_bdi_destroy(struct backing_dev_info *bdi) { }
#endif /* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */
--
2.10.2
