Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: Add iocontext priority to request

2016-10-04 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, Adam. On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 08:49:18AM -0700, Adam Manzanares wrote: > > I wonder whether the right thing to do is adding bio->bi_ioprio which > > is initialized on bio submission and carried through req->ioprio. > > I looked around and thought about this and I'm not sure if this will

Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: Add iocontext priority to request

2016-10-04 Thread Adam Manzanares
Hello Tejun, 10/02/2016 10:53, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Adam. > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 09:02:17AM -0700, Adam Manzanares wrote: > > I'll start with the changes I made and work my way through a grep of > > > > ioprio. Please add or correct any of the assumptions I have made.

Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: Add iocontext priority to request

2016-09-30 Thread Adam Manzanares
Hello Tejun, The 09/29/2016 10:40, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:14:54AM -0700, Adam Manzanares wrote: > > Patch adds association between iocontext and a request. > > > > Signed-off-by: Adam Manzanares > > Can you please describe how this

Re: [PATCH 1/3] block: Add iocontext priority to request

2016-09-29 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 11:14:54AM -0700, Adam Manzanares wrote: > Patch adds association between iocontext and a request. > > Signed-off-by: Adam Manzanares Can you please describe how this may impact existing usages? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from