[PATCH V2 0/1] percpu-refcount: fix reference leak during percpu-atomic transition

2017-01-27 Thread Douglas Miller
Removed extraneous parentheses. Did not switch to "bool" as that would necessitate more testing and raises the question whether other platforms might have a different definition for "bool" that would not fix this problem. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block"

Re: [PATCH V2 0/1] percpu-refcount: fix reference leak during percpu-atomic transition

2017-01-27 Thread Douglas Miller
I will re-test and post the patch using "bool" when finished. On 01/27/2017 06:13 PM, Tejun Heo wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 05:32:15PM -0600, Douglas Miller wrote: Removed extraneous parentheses. Did not switch to "bool" as that would necessitate more testing and raises the question

Re: [PATCH V2 0/1] percpu-refcount: fix reference leak during percpu-atomic transition

2017-01-27 Thread Tejun Heo
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 05:32:15PM -0600, Douglas Miller wrote: > Removed extraneous parentheses. Did not switch to "bool" as that would > necessitate > more testing and raises the question whether other platforms might have a > different > definition for "bool" that would not fix this problem.