On 01/10/2017 12:38 AM, Coly Li wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'd like to propose a general md raid discussion, it is quite necessary
for most of active md raid developers sit together to discuss current
challenge of Linux software raid and development trends.
In the last years, we have many development
g.me>
Cc: Alexander Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqji...@suse.com>
---
drivers/block/drbd/drbd_int.h | 3 +--
drivers/md/dm-mpath.c | 3 +--
drivers/nvme/target/io-cmd.c | 3 +--
fs/block_dev.c| 3 +--
4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 del
it is a good idea, and even the two patches can be put into
one, so how about the following patch?
Looks good.
Acked-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqji...@suse.com>
Thanks,
Guoqing
Shaohua, what do you think of this one?
---
diff --git a/drivers/md/md.c b/drivers/md/md.c
index 3d957ac1e109..7ffc62
On 06/26/2017 08:09 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
We will support multipage bvec soon, so initialize bvec
table using the standardy way instead of writing the
talbe directly. Otherwise it won't work any more once
multipage bvec is enabled.
Cc: Shaohua Li
Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
bio_io_error was introduced in the commit 4246a0b
("block: add a bi_error field to struct bio"), so
use it directly.
Signed-off-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqji...@suse.com>
---
block/blk-core.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/
On 09/29/2017 02:45 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 09:57:41AM +0800, Guoqing Jiang wrote:
On 09/28/2017 06:13 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
MD's rdev_set_badblocks() expects that badblocks_set() returns 1 if
badblocks are disabled, otherwise, rdev_set_badblocks() will record
superblock
On 09/28/2017 06:13 AM, Liu Bo wrote:
MD's rdev_set_badblocks() expects that badblocks_set() returns 1 if
badblocks are disabled, otherwise, rdev_set_badblocks() will record
superblock changes and return success in that case and md will fail to
report an IO error which it should.
This bug has
Hi,
On 12/08/2017 08:34 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
So plugging in a device on USB with BFQ as scheduler now works without
hiccup (probably thanks to Ming Lei's last patch), but of course I found
another problem. Unmounting the device after use, changing the scheduler
back to deadline or
On 12/21/2017 03:53 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
Il giorno 21 dic 2017, alle ore 08:08, Guoqing Jiang <gqji...@suse.com> ha
scritto:
Hi,
On 12/08/2017 08:34 AM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
So plugging in a device on USB with BFQ as scheduler now works without
hiccup (probably thanks t
vein,
bfqg_stats_xfer_dead is not executed for a root group.
This commit fixes bfq_pd_offline so that the latter executes the above
missing operations for a root group too.
Reported-by: Holger Hoffstätte <hol...@applied-asynchrony.com>
Reported-by: Guoqing Jiang <gqji...@suse.com>
On 01/10/2018 02:13 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
Il giorno 10 gen 2018, alle ore 02:41, Guoqing Jiang <gqji...@suse.com> ha
scritto:
On 01/09/2018 05:27 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
For each pair [device for which bfq is selected as I/O scheduler,
group in blkio/io], bfq mai
Hi,
In my test, I found some issues when try bfq with xfs.
The test basically just set the disk's scheduler to bfq,
create xfs on top of it, mount fs and write something,
then umount the fs. After several rounds of iteration,
I can see different calltraces appeared.
For example, the one which
On 01/03/2018 03:44 PM, Paolo Valente wrote:
Il giorno 03 gen 2018, alle ore 04:58, Guoqing Jiang <gqji...@suse.com> ha
scritto:
Hi,
Hi
In my test, I found some issues when try bfq with xfs.
The test basically just set the disk's scheduler to bfq,
create xfs on top of it, mo
13 matches
Mail list logo