TWIMC: This issue is tracked in the regression reports for Linux 4.13
(http://bit.ly/lnxregrep413 ) with this id:
Linux-Regression-ID: lr#35498d
Please include this line in the comment section of patches that are
supposed to fix the issue. Please also mention the string once in other
mailinglist
Lo! Your friendly Linux regression tracker here ;-)
On 08.03.2018 14:18, Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 18:53 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> This patchset tries to spread among online CPUs as far as possible, so
>> that we can avoid to allocate too less irq vectors with online CPUs
>>
[TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel
regressions; the text you find below is based on a few templates
paragraphs you might have encountered already in similar form.
See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]
On 22.12.23 19:31, Ira Weiny wrote:
> Coly,
>
> Yesterday
On 23.12.23 09:35, Linux regression tracking #adding (Thorsten Leemhuis)
wrote:
> On 22.12.23 19:31, Ira Weiny wrote:
>> Coly,
>>
>> Yesterday I noticed that a few of our nvdimm tests were failing. I bisected
>> the problem to the following commit.
>>
>>