On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 9:27 AM, Tetsuo Handa
wrote:
> Omar Sandoval wrote:
>> From: Omar Sandoval
>>
>> Commit 2d1d4c1e591f made loop_get_status() drop lo_ctx_mutex before
>> returning, but the loop_get_status_old(), loop_get_status64(), and
>>
Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval
>
> Commit 2d1d4c1e591f made loop_get_status() drop lo_ctx_mutex before
> returning, but the loop_get_status_old(), loop_get_status64(), and
> loop_get_status_compat() wrappers don't call loop_get_status() if the
> passed argument is
On 4/6/18 10:57 AM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval
>
> Commit 2d1d4c1e591f made loop_get_status() drop lo_ctx_mutex before
> returning, but the loop_get_status_old(), loop_get_status64(), and
> loop_get_status_compat() wrappers don't call loop_get_status() if the
>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 09:57:03AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> From: Omar Sandoval
>
> Commit 2d1d4c1e591f made loop_get_status() drop lo_ctx_mutex before
> returning, but the loop_get_status_old(), loop_get_status64(), and
> loop_get_status_compat() wrappers don't call
From: Omar Sandoval
Commit 2d1d4c1e591f made loop_get_status() drop lo_ctx_mutex before
returning, but the loop_get_status_old(), loop_get_status64(), and
loop_get_status_compat() wrappers don't call loop_get_status() if the
passed argument is NULL. The callers expect that the