4.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>

commit 5f042e7cbd9ebd3580077dcdc21f35e68c2adf5f upstream.

This way we get a nice distribution independent of the current cpu
online / offline state.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk>
Cc: Keith Busch <keith.bu...@intel.com>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-n...@lists.infradead.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170626102058.10200-2-...@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksa...@natalenko.name>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efa...@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 block/blk-mq-cpumap.c |    5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
@@ -35,7 +35,6 @@ int blk_mq_map_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_
 {
        unsigned int *map = set->mq_map;
        unsigned int nr_queues = set->nr_hw_queues;
-       const struct cpumask *online_mask = cpu_online_mask;
        unsigned int i, nr_cpus, nr_uniq_cpus, queue, first_sibling;
        cpumask_var_t cpus;
 
@@ -44,7 +43,7 @@ int blk_mq_map_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_
 
        cpumask_clear(cpus);
        nr_cpus = nr_uniq_cpus = 0;
-       for_each_cpu(i, online_mask) {
+       for_each_present_cpu(i) {
                nr_cpus++;
                first_sibling = get_first_sibling(i);
                if (!cpumask_test_cpu(first_sibling, cpus))
@@ -54,7 +53,7 @@ int blk_mq_map_queues(struct blk_mq_tag_
 
        queue = 0;
        for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
-               if (!cpumask_test_cpu(i, online_mask)) {
+               if (!cpumask_test_cpu(i, cpu_present_mask)) {
                        map[i] = 0;
                        continue;
                }


Reply via email to