On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 04:17:27PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 10:36 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Bart Van Assche
> > wrote:
> > > It is known that during the resume following a hibernate sometimes the
> > > system
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 04:17:27PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> This patch series definitely is an alternative for blk-mq/scsi-mq. And as you
> know my approach can be extended easily to the legacy SCSI core by adding
> blk_queue_enter() / blk_queue_exit() calls where necessary in the legacy
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 10:36 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Bart Van Assche
> wrote:
> > It is known that during the resume following a hibernate sometimes the
> > system hangs instead of coming up properly. This patch series fixes this
> >
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Hello Jens,
>
> It is known that during the resume following a hibernate sometimes the
> system hangs instead of coming up properly. This patch series fixes this
> problem. This patch series is an alternative for
Hello Jens,
It is known that during the resume following a hibernate sometimes the
system hangs instead of coming up properly. This patch series fixes this
problem. This patch series is an alternative for Ming Lei's "[PATCH V5
0/10] block/scsi: safe SCSI quiescing" patch series. The advantages of