Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Make SCSI device suspend and resume work reliably

2017-09-26 Thread Ming Lei
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 04:17:27PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 10:36 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Bart Van Assche > > wrote: > > > It is known that during the resume following a hibernate sometimes the > > > system

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Make SCSI device suspend and resume work reliably

2017-09-25 Thread h...@lst.de
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 04:17:27PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote: > This patch series definitely is an alternative for blk-mq/scsi-mq. And as you > know my approach can be extended easily to the legacy SCSI core by adding > blk_queue_enter() / blk_queue_exit() calls where necessary in the legacy

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Make SCSI device suspend and resume work reliably

2017-09-25 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Mon, 2017-09-25 at 10:36 +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Bart Van Assche > wrote: > > It is known that during the resume following a hibernate sometimes the > > system hangs instead of coming up properly. This patch series fixes this > >

Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Make SCSI device suspend and resume work reliably

2017-09-24 Thread Ming Lei
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 6:13 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Hello Jens, > > It is known that during the resume following a hibernate sometimes the > system hangs instead of coming up properly. This patch series fixes this > problem. This patch series is an alternative for

[PATCH v3 0/6] Make SCSI device suspend and resume work reliably

2017-09-22 Thread Bart Van Assche
Hello Jens, It is known that during the resume following a hibernate sometimes the system hangs instead of coming up properly. This patch series fixes this problem. This patch series is an alternative for Ming Lei's "[PATCH V5 0/10] block/scsi: safe SCSI quiescing" patch series. The advantages of