On Wed, Aug 23 2017 at 11:12am -0400,
Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 19:35 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > soft lockup still can be observed easily with patch d4acf3650c7c(
> > block: Make blk_mq_delay_kick_requeue_list() rerun the queue at a quiet
> > time),
> > but no hard lockup.
>
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Bart Van Assche
wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 19:35 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
>> soft lockup still can be observed easily with patch d4acf3650c7c(
>> block: Make blk_mq_delay_kick_requeue_list() rerun the queue at a quiet
>> time),
>> but no hard lockup.
>
> Hello
On Wed, 2017-08-23 at 19:35 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> soft lockup still can be observed easily with patch d4acf3650c7c(
> block: Make blk_mq_delay_kick_requeue_list() rerun the queue at a quiet time),
> but no hard lockup.
Hello Ming,
I never claimed that commit d4acf3650c7c was a full solution to
On Wed, Aug 23, 2017 at 07:35:26PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 05:10:01PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 12:43 -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote:
> > > Your latest patch on stock upstream without Ming's latest patches is
> > > behaving for me.
> > >
> > >
On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 05:10:01PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 12:43 -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote:
> > Your latest patch on stock upstream without Ming's latest patches is
> > behaving for me.
> >
> > As already mentioned, the requeue -11 and clone failure messages are
On Wed, 2017-08-09 at 12:43 -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote:
> Your latest patch on stock upstream without Ming's latest patches is
> behaving for me.
>
> As already mentioned, the requeue -11 and clone failure messages are
> gone and I am not actually seeing any soft lockups or hard lockups.
>
>
On 08/08/2017 10:28 PM, Laurence Oberman wrote:
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 20:11 -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote:
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 22:17 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
Hi Guys,
Laurence and I see a system lockup issue when running
concurrent
big buffered write(4M bytes) to IB SRP on v4.13-rc3.
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 20:11 -0400, Laurence Oberman wrote:
> > On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 22:17 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > Hi Guys,
> > > >
> > > > Laurence and I see a system lockup issue when running
> > concurrent
> > > > big buffered write(4M bytes) to IB SRP on v4.13-rc3.
> > > >
> > > > 1 ho
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 22:17 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Laurence and I see a system lockup issue when running concurrent
> big buffered write(4M bytes) to IB SRP on v4.13-rc3.
>
> 1 how to reproduce
>
> 1) setup IB_SRR & multi path
>
> #./start_opensm.sh
> #./start_srp.sh
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 22:17 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> Laurence and I see a system lockup issue when running concurrent
> big buffered write(4M bytes) to IB SRP on v4.13-rc3.
> [ ... ]
> #cat hammer_write.sh
> #!/bin/bash
> while true; do
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/map
Hi Guys,
Laurence and I see a system lockup issue when running concurrent
big buffered write(4M bytes) to IB SRP on v4.13-rc3.
1 how to reproduce
1) setup IB_SRR & multi path
#./start_opensm.sh
#./start_srp.sh
# cat start_opensm.sh
#!/bin/bash
rmmod ib
11 matches
Mail list logo
