On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 05:01:22PM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> But I've seen you reference the need to stop multipath from allocating
> its own requests. Are you referring to old request_fn request-based
> multipath's clone_old_rq:alloc_old_clone_request?
Yes, that one is the issue. It
On Wed, Jan 11 2017 at 3:45am -0500,
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:42:44AM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 04:06:19PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > Simply the boilerplate code needed for bsg nodes a bit.
> > >
> > >
On 01/11/2017 10:01 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:59:17AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
>> I'd advocate to discuss this at LSF.
>> Now that Mike moved the bio-based mpath stuff back in things got even
>> more complex.
>
> Yeah. If we'd _only_ have bio based support it
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:59:17AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> I'd advocate to discuss this at LSF.
> Now that Mike moved the bio-based mpath stuff back in things got even
> more complex.
Yeah. If we'd _only_ have bio based support it would simplify things
a lot, but as a third parallel path
On 01/11/2017 09:45 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:42:44AM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 04:06:19PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Simply the boilerplate code needed for bsg nodes a bit.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 09:42:44AM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 04:06:19PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Simply the boilerplate code needed for bsg nodes a bit.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> > ---
>
> that reminds me of posting my
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 04:06:19PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Simply the boilerplate code needed for bsg nodes a bit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> ---
that reminds me of posting my SAS bsg-lib patch...
Anyways looks good,
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn