Re: [PATCH 2/2] nbd: don't start req until after the dead connection logic
On Thu, 2018-05-17 at 14:41 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > Yup I can tell you why, on 4.11 where I originally did this work > __blk_mq_requeue_request() did this > > static void __blk_mq_requeue_request(struct request *rq) > { > struct request_queue *q = rq->q; > > trace_block_rq_requeue(q, rq); > rq_qos_requeue(q, &rq->issue_stat); > blk_mq_sched_requeue_request(rq); > > if (test_and_clear_bit(REQ_ATOM_STARTED, &rq->atomic_flags)) { > if (q->dma_drain_size && blk_rq_bytes(rq)) > rq->nr_phys_segments--; > } > } > > So it was clearing the started part when it did the requeue. If that's not > what > I'm supposed to be doing anymore then I can send a patch to fix it. What is > supposed to be done if I did already do blk_mq_start_request, because I can > avoid doing the start until after that chunk of code, but there's a part > further > down that needs to have start done before we reach it, so I'll have to do > whatever the special thing is now there. Thanks, Hello Josef, After having had a closer look I think calling blk_mq_start_request() before blk_mq_requeue_request() is fine anyway. The v4.16 block layer core namely defers timeout processing until after .queue_rq() has returned. So the timeout code shouldn't see the requests for which both blk_mq_start_request() and blk_mq_requeue_request() are called from inside .queue_rq(). I will make sure this behavior is preserved. Bart.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] nbd: don't start req until after the dead connection logic
On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 06:21:40PM +, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 16:21 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > > + blk_mq_start_request(req); > > if (unlikely(nsock->pending && nsock->pending != req)) { > > blk_mq_requeue_request(req, true); > > ret = 0; > > (replying to an e-mail from seven months ago) > > Hello Josef, > > Are you aware that the nbd driver is one of the very few block drivers that > calls blk_mq_requeue_request() after a request has been started? I think that > can lead to the block layer core to undesired behavior, e.g. that the timeout > handler fires concurrently with a request being reinstered. Can you or a > colleague have a look at this? I would like to add the following code to the > block layer core and I think that the nbd driver would trigger this warning: > > void blk_mq_requeue_request(struct request *rq, bool kick_requeue_list) > { > + WARN_ON_ONCE(old_state != MQ_RQ_COMPLETE); > + > __blk_mq_requeue_request(rq); > Yup I can tell you why, on 4.11 where I originally did this work __blk_mq_requeue_request() did this static void __blk_mq_requeue_request(struct request *rq) { struct request_queue *q = rq->q; trace_block_rq_requeue(q, rq); rq_qos_requeue(q, &rq->issue_stat); blk_mq_sched_requeue_request(rq); if (test_and_clear_bit(REQ_ATOM_STARTED, &rq->atomic_flags)) { if (q->dma_drain_size && blk_rq_bytes(rq)) rq->nr_phys_segments--; } } So it was clearing the started part when it did the requeue. If that's not what I'm supposed to be doing anymore then I can send a patch to fix it. What is supposed to be done if I did already do blk_mq_start_request, because I can avoid doing the start until after that chunk of code, but there's a part further down that needs to have start done before we reach it, so I'll have to do whatever the special thing is now there. Thanks, Josef
Re: [PATCH 2/2] nbd: don't start req until after the dead connection logic
On Thu, 2017-10-19 at 16:21 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > + blk_mq_start_request(req); > if (unlikely(nsock->pending && nsock->pending != req)) { > blk_mq_requeue_request(req, true); > ret = 0; (replying to an e-mail from seven months ago) Hello Josef, Are you aware that the nbd driver is one of the very few block drivers that calls blk_mq_requeue_request() after a request has been started? I think that can lead to the block layer core to undesired behavior, e.g. that the timeout handler fires concurrently with a request being reinstered. Can you or a colleague have a look at this? I would like to add the following code to the block layer core and I think that the nbd driver would trigger this warning: void blk_mq_requeue_request(struct request *rq, bool kick_requeue_list) { + WARN_ON_ONCE(old_state != MQ_RQ_COMPLETE); + __blk_mq_requeue_request(rq); Thanks, Bart.