On Sat, Jun 03 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This series introduces a new blk_status_t error code type for the block
> layer so that we can have tigher control and explicit semantics for
> block layer errors.
>
> All but the last three patches are cleanups that lead to the new type.
>
> The
On Fri, Jun 09 2017, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08 2017 at 11:42am -0400,
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> > On 06/03/2017 01:37 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > > This series introduces a new blk_status_t error code type for the block
> > > layer so that we can have tigher
On Thu, Jun 08 2017 at 11:42am -0400,
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 06/03/2017 01:37 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This series introduces a new blk_status_t error code type for the block
> > layer so that we can have tigher control and explicit semantics for
> > block layer errors.
On Thu, Jun 08 2017 at 11:42am -0400,
Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 06/03/2017 01:37 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This series introduces a new blk_status_t error code type for the block
> > layer so that we can have tigher control and explicit semantics for
> > block layer errors.
On 06/03/2017 01:37 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This series introduces a new blk_status_t error code type for the block
> layer so that we can have tigher control and explicit semantics for
> block layer errors.
>
> All but the last three patches are cleanups that lead to the new type.
>
>
On Fri, May 26, 2017 at 11:56:07AM +0300, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This series introduces a new blk_status_t error code type for the block
> layer so that we can have tigher control and explicit semantics for
> block layer errors.
>
> All but the last three patches are cleanups that lead to the
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 04:55:08PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> JFYI, the patches 13 and 15 are missing, not in linux-btrfs mailbox and
> patchwork web. Does not look like a delay, maybe vger refused them
> completely.
They still haven't made it to linux-block and linux-btrfs, but they did
make
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 03:17:57PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> This series introduces a new blk_status_t error code type for the block
> layer so that we can have tigher control and explicit semantics for
> block layer errors.
>
> All but the last three patches are cleanups that lead to the