On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:50:48PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
echo x1 /mnt/x/d/foo.txt || exit 2
btrfsctl -s /mnt/x/snap /mnt/x/d
You're just missing a sync/fsync() between these two lines.
We argued on IRC a
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:50:48PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
echo x1 /mnt/x/d/foo.txt || exit 2
btrfsctl -s /mnt/x/snap /mnt/x/d
You're just
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:18:01AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:50:48PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
echo x1 /mnt/x/d/foo.txt ||
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:18:01AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:50:48PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:11 PM,
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:27:00AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 8:22 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 08:18:01AM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:22:12PM -0600, Ravi Pinjala wrote:
On 02/12/10 09:19, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 08:50:48PM -0800, Mike Fedyk wrote:
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Chris Ballc...@laptop.org wrote:
echo x1 /mnt/x/d/foo.txt || exit 2
btrfsctl -s
This is the man page of the btrfs command.
diff --git a/man/Makefile b/man/Makefile
index 4e8893b..4a90b75 100644
--- a/man/Makefile
+++ b/man/Makefile
@@ -7,13 +7,16 @@ mandir = $(prefix)/man
man8dir = $(mandir)/man8
MANPAGES = mkfs.btrfs.8.gz btrfsctl.8.gz btrfsck.8.gz btrfs-image.8.gz \
-
Hi,
Is there a race in there? It seems like if a process starts
modifying a file between the sync and the snapshot, data could
still be lost. Is there something else going on here that I'm
missing that would prevent this race?
AIUI, you're correct that a writer process concurrent
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 10:19:40AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
3) sync - this is not as obvious. sync doesn't mean anything than start
writing back dirty data to the fs, and returns before it's done. For btrfs
what that means is we run through _every_ inode that has delalloc pages
associated
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Goffredo Baroncelli
kreij...@gmail.com wrote:
Usage:
btrfs delete|-D subvolume
Delete the subvolume subvolume.
btrfs defrag|-d file|dir [file|dir...]
Defragment a file or a directory.
I think the short options
Yan, Zheng yanzh...@21cn.com writes:
The loop is due to fragments of free space. I'm working on make 'btrfs-vol -b'
return -ENOSPC in this case.
If I remember correctly the filesystem had 3G free space according to
df, which I know is not reliable on btrfs.
After removing one 540M file
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Alex Elsayed eternal...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm getting a rather nasty BUG when I try to mount this filesystem,
_including_ when I specify -o ro. I'm unsure what caused it, but the problem
manifested after my computer hardlocked while reading my RSS feeds, complete
12 matches
Mail list logo
