On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:17 PM, Miao Xie wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:01:26 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> On 07/19/2010 09:56 AM, Miao Xie wrote:
>>> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:12:13 -0400, Chris Mason
>>> wrote:
>>> It seems that the btrfs doesn't support the sectorsize which is
>>> grea
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 10:01:26 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
> On 07/19/2010 09:56 AM, Miao Xie wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:12:13 -0400, Chris Mason
>> wrote:
>> It seems that the btrfs doesn't support the sectorsize which is
>> greater than the page size just like ext2/3/4, though we can
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 04:26:45PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 04:02:16PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > Hi,
> > We have file readahead to do asyn file read, but has no metadata
> > readahead. For a list of files, their metadata is stored in fragmented
> > disk space and meta
On 07/19/2010 09:56 AM, Miao Xie wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:12:13 -0400, Chris Mason
> wrote:
> It seems that the btrfs doesn't support the sectorsize which is
> greater than the page size just like ext2/3/4, though we can use
> mkfs.btrfs to make a filesystem with a big sectorsi
On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 12:12:13 -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
It seems that the btrfs doesn't support the sectorsize which is
greater than the page size just like ext2/3/4, though we can use
mkfs.btrfs to make a filesystem with a big sectorsize. Am I right?
If yes, we must do mor
