On 12/10/2010 02:31 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
So alot of crazy people (I'm looking at you Meego) want to use btrfs on phones
and such with small devices. Unfortunately the way we split out metadata/data
chunks it makes space usage inefficient for volumes that are smaller than
1gigabyte. So add
When a btrfs disk is created by mixed data metadata option, it will have no
pure data or pure metadata space info.
In btrfs's for-linus branch, commit 78b1ea13838039cd88afdd62519b40b344d6c920
(Btrfs: fix OOPS of empty filesystem after balance) initializes space infos at
the very beginning. The
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
when I run balance or delete and /dev/btrfs-control doesn't exist
or is nor properly designed (I don't use udev) then the program shows
an error message and then continiues its work; the result is garbage.
The programs (or program options) which use a wellformed device
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
is the patch mentionend in
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/7473
included now?
I still get error messages related to floppy when I run balance, when
I run show then btrfs still tries many non existing devices (I don't
use udev).
Kernel
Hi,
a missing check ...
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 06:06:08PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
This patch introduces a basic form of progress monitoring for balance
operations, by counting the number of block groups remaining. The
information is exposed to userspace by an ioctl.
Signed-off-by: Hugo
On 04/08/2011 03:31 AM, liubo wrote:
On 12/10/2010 02:31 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
So alot of crazy people (I'm looking at you Meego) want to use btrfs on phones
and such with small devices. Unfortunately the way we split out metadata/data
chunks it makes space usage inefficient for volumes that
Hi,
sorry for separate mail, just noticed a kfree inside a spinlock below
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 06:06:08PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -2115,10 +2162,20 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_root *dev_root)
On 04/07/2011 10:26 PM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
Hi Josef, Chris,
On 8 April 2011 00:23, Josef Bacikjo...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/07/2011 03:21 AM, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
When running a practical stress-test on 2.6.29-rc2 trying to reproduce
an older (extent refcounting) issue, I am
Hi, Li,
Thanks for the comments.
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 10:26:17AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
01:06, Hugo Mills wrote:
This patch introduces a basic form of progress monitoring for balance
operations, by counting the number of block groups remaining. The
information is exposed to
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 03:37:15PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
Hi,
sorry for separate mail, just noticed a kfree inside a spinlock below
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 06:06:08PM +0100, Hugo Mills wrote:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -2115,10 +2162,20 @@ int
Hi,
nope. All patches to the btrfs-progs aren't yet in the git. I think
it's up to chris to push all the patches.
Regards,
Felix
Am 08 Apr 2011 14:00:00 +0200
schrieb Helmut Hullen hul...@t-online.de:
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
when I run balance or delete and /dev/btrfs-control doesn't
exist
On 04/08/2011 01:53 AM, Jeff Wu wrote:
Hi ,
I applied the patch to 2.6.39-rc1,took the following steps to compile
it:make make modules_install make install mkinitramfs
but , it seam that it don't run to WARN_ON(block_rsv ==
root-orphan_block_rsv);
i attached the codes and logs at the below:
a missing check ...
ah, forget it,
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 03:12:21PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 5fdb2ab..a8fbb07 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -2375,6 +2375,38 @@ static noinline long
Apparently it is ok to submit a read to an IDE device with the same target page
for different offsets. This is what Windows does under qemu. The problem is
under DIO we expect them to be different buffers for checksumming reasons, and
so this sort of thing will result in checksum errors, when in
Hello,
So I've been trying to track down checksumming errors Eric Paris was
getting while running Windows 7 in qemu. Turns out we had one valid
problem (we don't deal well with reading with an iovec with two
iov_base's that are the same), and we have a problem with the pages
being changed
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 16:44:37 +0800
liubo liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
When a btrfs disk is created by mixed data metadata option, it will have no
pure data or pure metadata space info.
In btrfs's for-linus branch, commit 78b1ea13838039cd88afdd62519b40b344d6c920
(Btrfs: fix OOPS of
When a btrfs disk is created by mixed data metadata option, it will have
no
pure data or pure metadata space info.
In btrfs's for-linus branch, commit 78b1ea13838039cd88afdd62519b40b344d6c920
(Btrfs: fix OOPS of empty filesystem after balance) initializes space infos
at
the
In btrfs's for-linus branch, commit
78b1ea13838039cd88afdd62519b40b344d6c920
(Btrfs: fix OOPS of empty filesystem after balance) initializes space
infos at
the very beginning. The problem is this initialization does not take the
mixed
case into account, which will cause
This patch checks return value of btrfs_alloc_path() and removes BUG_ON().
Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sano yoshinori.s...@gmail.com
---
fs/btrfs/dir-item.c|2 ++
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c | 12
fs/btrfs/file-item.c |6 --
fs/btrfs/file.c|3 ++-
This patch fixes memory leaks in btrfs_new_inode().
Signed-off-by: Yoshinori Sano yoshinori.s...@gmail.com
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index aa116dc..d8c93c1 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
I can't switch a running btrfs filesystem balance ... via
ctrl z
bg
into the background, with other jobs this way works.
The stopping command ctrl z doesn't work.
(may be on other keyboards it's ctrl y)
What goes wrong?
Viele Gruesse!
Helmut
--
To
21 matches
Mail list logo
