Hi,
I have a local btrfs file system with various sub-volumes that have
had snapshots done on them.
Is there some tool like rsync that I could copy all the data and
snapshots to a backup system, but still only use the same amount of
space as the source filesystem.
I see a problem being getting a
Hey - been a few days, not meaning to pester but I wanted to make sure my
previous message didn't slip through the cracks. If I offended, I apologize - I
certainly didn't mean to, and my attempts at joviality can come across as
abrasive. If you simply haven't had time to look into this yet, or
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 08:34:46AM +, Skylar Burtenshaw wrote:
Hey - been a few days, not meaning to pester but I wanted to make sure my
previous message didn't slip through the cracks. If I offended, I apologize -
I
certainly didn't mean to, and my attempts at joviality can come across
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:34 PM, Skylar Burtenshaw daninfu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey - been a few days, not meaning to pester but I wanted to make sure my
previous message didn't slip through the cracks. If I offended, I apologize -
I
certainly didn't mean to, and my attempts at joviality can
Fajar A. Nugraha list at fajar.net writes:
Didn't Chris' last response basically say use kernel 3.2 or newer,
mount the fs (possibly with -o ro), and copy the data elsewhere?
Why yes, yes it did actually. I appreciate your spotlighting it, just in case I
somehow managed to miss it, though.
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 06:21:05PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
As Sadner says, you have to run btrfs dev scan before you try to
mount the FS. If you have root on btrfs, this will have to go in an
initrd; otherwise, it can go in your initscripts anywhere before the
non-root filesystem mounts.
Hugo Mills hugo at carfax.org.uk writes:
I suspect that Chris is working hard on getting queued-up patches
ready to go into the 3.4 kernel. He's usually quite quiet while he's
doing that.
Hugo.
Thanks Hugo - I assumed he was busy, I just wanted to make sure it wasn't a case
of
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Skylar Burtenshaw daninfu...@gmail.com wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha list at fajar.net writes:
Didn't Chris' last response basically say use kernel 3.2 or newer,
mount the fs (possibly with -o ro), and copy the data elsewhere?
Why yes, yes it did actually. I
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Felix Blanke felixbla...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/26/12 10:30 AM, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
Is there some tool like rsync that I could copy all the data and
snapshots to a backup system, but still only use the same amount of
space as the source filesystem.
Hello all,
I've just encountered a kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4263 due
to a usb connection hickup to the storage (so you might as well stop
reading now ;-) )
With google, a lot turns up on kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c,
but not on the specific line number, nor on
PC is at
Btrfs had been doing it's own file_update_time so we could catch ENOSPC
properly, so just update our btrfs_update_time to work with the new stuff and
then we'll be fancy later. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik jo...@redhat.com
---
fs/btrfs/ctree.h |1 -
fs/btrfs/file.c |2 +-
Btrfs has to make sure we have space to allocate new blocks in order to modify
the inode, so updating time can fail. We've gotten around this by having our
own file_update_time but this is kind of a pain, and Christoph has indicated he
would like to make xfs do something different with atime
Fajar A. Nugraha posted on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:01:54 +0700 as excerpted:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Felix Blanke felixbla...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 3/26/12 10:30 AM, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
Is there some tool like rsync that I could copy all the data and
snapshots to a backup system,
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Fajar A. Nugraha posted on Mon, 26 Mar 2012 16:01:54 +0700 as excerpted:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Felix Blanke felixbla...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 3/26/12 10:30 AM, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
Is there some tool like
On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 10:51 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 06:21:05PM +, Hugo Mills wrote:
As Sadner says, you have to run btrfs dev scan before you try to
mount the FS. If you have root on btrfs, this will have to go in an
initrd; otherwise, it can go in your
Hello,
I used btrfs some time to do incremental backups of large (200GB) VM
images, which worked fine using snapshots and rsync (with --inplace to
preserve COW).
The only problem with this solution is that it takes extremely long
due to rsync's performance on large files. For this reason, I can't
Hi Alex,
On 26.03.2012 17:46, Alexander Block wrote:
I used btrfs some time to do incremental backups of large (200GB) VM
images, which worked fine using snapshots and rsync (with --inplace to
preserve COW).
The only problem with this solution is that it takes extremely long
due to rsync's
Was working this morning and my kernel crashed. Unfortunately one of
my two btrfs partitions would not mount after rebooting, this is the
error log:
[ 1518.147030] device label MediaNew devid 1 transid 28844 /dev/sdc3
[ 1518.147364] btrfs: enabling auto defrag
[ 1518.147372] btrfs: use lzo
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 02:40:24PM -0700, Not Zippy wrote:
Was working this morning and my kernel crashed. Unfortunately one of
my two btrfs partitions would not mount after rebooting, this is the
error log:
[ 1518.147030] device label MediaNew devid 1 transid 28844 /dev/sdc3
[ 1518.147364]
Hugo
I did try the dangerdonteveruse branch and thats the error btrfsck
--repair gave me. Looks like the btrfs-restore command may work
(thanks!). And yes I do have backups for the important data - I had
some other data on there which would need to be d/l again..
I don't dabble that much with the
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 03:36:13PM -0700, Not Zippy wrote:
Hugo
I did try the dangerdonteveruse branch and thats the error btrfsck
--repair gave me.
Oooh, a brave one, I see. ;)
Looks like the btrfs-restore command may work (thanks!). And yes I
do have backups for the important data - I
Hello,
I was just wondering what the status of the patch that would fix my
problem is. I have not heard from anyone in over a month, and I just
wanted to check in and see how it is progressing, or if you have put
it on hold for more important work like kernel 3.4. Thank you again
for helping me.
On 27/03/12 09:47, Hugo Mills wrote:
I'd definitely recommend running as recent a kernel as you can --
either the last released (3.3 in this case)
I'm not sure I'd recommend 3.3; there were a number of reports of a
regression regarding preamture ENOSPC in that code which was bisected to
a
23 matches
Mail list logo
