Hey!
I recently starting playing with btrfs and subvolume, but it has left
me puzzled:
Distribution is Archlinux, Kernel is 3.4.6.
root@horus /mnt # mkfs.btrfs -L test /dev/sdb1
WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL
WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using
fs created
trans-transid is cpu endian but we want to store the data as little
endian. item-ctime.nsec is only 32 bits, not 64.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
---
Applies to linux-next.
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index 43f0012..a1fbca0 100644
---
add_qgroup_rb() never returns NULL, only error pointers.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
---
Applies to linux-next.
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
index bc424ae..b650155 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
@@ -1364,8 +1364,10 @@ int
These are returning zero when it should be returning a negative error
code.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter dan.carpen...@oracle.com
---
Applies to linux-next.
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
index b650155..38b42e7 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c
@@ -1371,8
Am 29.07.2012 21:13, schrieb C Anthony Risinger:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Konstantin Dmitriev
ksee.zelga...@gmail.com wrote:
Dipl.-Ing. Michael Niederle mniederle at gmx.at writes:
I reinstalled over 700 packages - plt-scheme beeing the only one failing
due to
the btrfs link
From: Zhou Bo zhoub-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
This patch adds btrfs snapshot function test to xfstests
Signed-off-by: Zhou Bo zhoub-f...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
v2: address comments from David Sterba
285 | 387 +++
285.out |2 +
group
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:36 AM, Arnd Hannemann a...@arndnet.de wrote:
Am 29.07.2012 21:13, schrieb C Anthony Risinger:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Konstantin Dmitriev
ksee.zelga...@gmail.com wrote:
Dipl.-Ing. Michael Niederle mniederle at gmx.at writes:
I reinstalled over 700 packages
On fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:52:21 +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
# ll /mnt/1/snap0/1
total 0
[None]
# cd /mnt/1/snap0/1/snap0
[Enter a unexisted directory successfully...]
I confirmed that mkdir snap0 failed with File exists and
that rmdir can remove the directory snap0. So it is a kind of
Hallo, Arnd,
Du meintest am 30.07.12:
btrfs only fails when you have hundreds of hardlinks to the same
file in the *same* directory ... certainly not a standard use case.
Actually, hundreds of hardlinks is certainly over optimistic.
In my testing 15 links in the same directory were enough
On fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:29:57 +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 04:52:21PM +0900, Hidetoshi Seto wrote:
(2012/07/26 15:57), Miao Xie wrote:
btrfs_abort_transaction(trans, root, ret);
goto fail;
}
@@ -1386,13 +1408,13 @@ int btrfs_commit_transaction(struct
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 09:56 +0200, Florian Lindner wrote:
Hey!
I recently starting playing with btrfs and subvolume, but it has left
me puzzled:
root@horus /mnt/test # btrfs subvolume get-default .
ID 256 top level 5 path sv1
ID 259 top level 5 path sv2
What is the default subvolume
On 07/30/2012 03:56 PM, Florian Lindner wrote:
Hey!
I recently starting playing with btrfs and subvolume, but it has left
me puzzled:
Distribution is Archlinux, Kernel is 3.4.6.
root@horus /mnt # mkfs.btrfs -L test /dev/sdb1
WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL
WARNING! - see
Le 30/07/2012 13:29, Calvin Walton a écrit :
It looks like there's currently a bug in btrfs-progs - the 'get-default'
command is actually doing a 'list' instead of printing the default. With
any luck it's just a little error in the command-line parsing and should
be easy to fix...
I've fallen
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 04:20:02PM -0600, Mitch Harder wrote:
When compiling without SMP and generic x86_64, I encountered the
following errors due to vmalloc.h not being implicitly included:
CC fs/btrfs/send.o
fs/btrfs/send.c: In function ‘fs_path_free’:
fs/btrfs/send.c:185:4:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 03:14:28PM +0800, majianpeng wrote:
When exec bio_alloc, the bi_rw is zero.But after calling bio_add_page,
What about submit_bio? That sets the bi_rw as well?
it will use bi_rw.
Fox example, in functiion __bio_add_page,it will call merge_bvec_fn().
function.
The
Hi,
I did not apply the patch but instead added a check for dir != tmp_dir
only. The reason to not check for gen is that I have a rule in my
mind: I only pass the generation number to functions where I want to
know the *current* state. is_first_ref is for permanent state, the
return value
Am Sonntag, 24. Januar 2010 schrieb Michael Niederle:
I'm using btrfs with a kernel 2.6.32.2 (builtin) as the root file
system of a Gentoo Linux installation.
Upgrade your kernel!
This kernel is wy to old for any production use of
BTRFS. Heck, upstream still did not
Hi,
I was trying to mount two-disk btrfs without the first disk (the setup is RAID1
data metadata
on two disks). Kernel is 3.5.0-6-generic from Ubuntu.
[ 977.061470] device label HOME devid 2 transid 24686 /dev/sda3
[ 977.062992] btrfs: allowing degraded mounts
[ 977.063300] btrfs: disk
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 12:25:01PM -0600, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
I was trying to mount two-disk btrfs without the first disk (the setup is
RAID1 data metadata
on two disks). Kernel is 3.5.0-6-generic from Ubuntu.
[ 977.061470] device label HOME devid 2 transid 24686
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Alex Lyakas
alex.bolshoy.bt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I did not apply the patch but instead added a check for dir != tmp_dir
only. The reason to not check for gen is that I have a rule in my
mind: I only pass the generation number to functions where I want to
Hi Florian,
in case you would like to have some code references, to better
understand how it works:
1. Why is the default subvolid=5?
The trees in Btrfs all are referenced in the root tree by their
OBJECTIDs. You can find the definitions(magic numbers) for the
main trees in ctree.h:
For example,
Hi everybody,
I believe Florian came across some odd behaviour of btrfs subvolume
set-default which might still not be perfect in the current btrfs-progs: It
does not seem to change the default subvolume to the original root fs tree
if he does btrfs subvolume set-default 0 /path/to/fs.
I am
The command btrfs subvolume set-default 0 /path/to/fs changed the
default subvolume to whatever subvolume was currently mounted on
/path/to/fs. This patch changes this behaviour to set the default
subvolume to BTRFS_FS_TREE_OBJECTID in case the user asks for
subvolid=0
Signed-off-by: Alexander
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 08:55:59AM +0800, majianpeng wrote:
On 2012-07-31 05:42 Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com Wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 03:14:28PM +0800, majianpeng wrote:
When exec bio_alloc, the bi_rw is zero.But after calling bio_add_page,
it will use bi_rw.
Fox example, in
On 07/31/2012 03:55 AM, Kyle Gates wrote:
I have a 3 disk raid1 filesystem mounted with nodatacow. I have a
folder in said filesystem with the 'C' NOCOW 'Z' Not_Compressed
flags set for good measure. I then copy in a large file and proceed to
make random modifications. Filefrag shows no
On 07/31/2012 12:35 PM, Kyle Gates wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 9:00 PM, Liu Bo liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com wrote:
On 07/31/2012 03:55 AM, Kyle Gates wrote:
I have a 3 disk raid1 filesystem mounted with nodatacow. I have a
folder in said filesystem with the 'C' NOCOW 'Z' Not_Compressed
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 23:26:42 -0400 (EDT)
serial...@lavabit.com wrote:
1) is there a tool to help me recover data from my fs? I don't have a
backup of my partition table and so I have about 500GB of space where a
few partitionns might reside... GPT partitions mind you
If you only lost the
Btrfs's subvolume/snapshot is limited to
[BTRFS_FIRST_FREE_OBJECTID, BTRFS_LAST_FREE_OBJECTID], so just apply the range.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo liubo2...@cn.fujitsu.com
---
btrfs-list.c |6 --
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/btrfs-list.c b/btrfs-list.c
index
The idea is that we usually use snapshot to backup/restore our data, and the
common way can be a cron script which makes lots of snapshots, so we can end
up with spending some time to find the latest snapshot to restore.
This adds a feature for 'btrfs subvolume list' to let it list snapshots by
This adds the ability to show root's modification generation when we use
btrfs subvol list.
NOTE:
Like file's atime and ctime, root's generation also has 'creation generation'
and 'modification generation'.
The generation that we're going to show is 'modification generation', and the
next patch
30 matches
Mail list logo
