On Thu, 9 Aug 2012 09:21:29 +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 08:48:02AM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
and down, no problems so far, and the wikipedia test-subvol stresstest
that caused trouble to one of your patches is also ok. I'll do some more
testing on other machines and
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 07:55:59PM -0600, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6:53 PM, Chris Samuel ch...@csamuel.org wrote:
This pull request with a whole heap of btrfs fixes (46 commits) appears
not to have been merged yet, does anyone know if it was rejected or just
missed ?
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:30:14PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
IMO the following is better, just make use of the original check. If you
agree with this,
I'll send it as a patch :)
I think it's cleaner to keep all flags that get inherited from the
directory - new file at one place, ie
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:06:03PM +0600, Roman Mamedov wrote:
2) On filesystem converted with btrfs-convert the metadata allocation is
unnecessarily large due to some other, conversion-related reasons; but this
can be fixed with btrfs filesystem balance -musage=5 /mount/point (do
several runs
On 08/21/2012 10:33 PM, David Sterba wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 11:30:14PM +0800, Liu Bo wrote:
IMO the following is better, just make use of the original check. If you
agree with this,
I'll send it as a patch :)
I think it's cleaner to keep all flags that get inherited from the
Hi all,
as suggested on the mailing list I have converted the updated LZO
code into git, so please pull my lzo-update branch from
git://github.com/markus-oberhumer/linux.git lzo-update
You can browse the branch at
https://github.com/markus-oberhumer/linux/compare/lzo-update
I'd ask some
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 03:05:11PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:51 PM, dg1727 dg1...@hushmail.com wrote:
permissions of the directories in /dev are drwx-- for the NTFS
and dr-xr-xr-x for the Btrfs.
How can the OS be set up so that the Btrfs will automount
Hi,
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 09:02:07PM -0700, Not Zippy wrote:
My sabayon box locked up while doing a repo sync, now I am getting the
following errors on one directory on my btrfs partition
Can you be more specific how did you get to the state?
Did you see any related error messages in syslog
Hi
Thanks for the analysis, unfortunately I get the same assert error
when I attempt to run the repair from the compiled source.
# ./work/builds/btrfs-progs/btrfsck
usage: btrfsck dev
Btrfs Btrfs v0.19
# ./work/builds/btrfs-progs/btrfsck --repair /dev/sda2
enabling repair mode
checking extents
Curtis Jones wrote:
1. is btrfs-convert on /dev/md0
stable/reliable/tested/not-a-stupid-thing-to-do? 2. based on the reading
I've done, resizing btrfs is supported. can you confirm? 3. there aren't
any known compatibility or other issues with running btrfs on top of mdadm
(raid 6) 4. any
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:36:32 -0400 David Sterba d...@jikos.cz
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 03:05:11PM -0500, C Anthony Risinger
wrote:
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 2:51 PM, dg1727 dg1...@hushmail.com
wrote:
permissions of the directories in /dev are drwx-- for the
NTFS and dr-xr-xr-x
From: Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com
We cannot just return error before freeing ordered extent and releasing reserved
space when we fail to start a transacion.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo bo.li@oracle.com
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c |7 +--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff
12 matches
Mail list logo
