Raid56 merge (merge commit e942f88) had mistakenly removed a call to
__cancel_balance(), which resulted in balance not cleaning up after itself
after a successful finish. (Cleanup includes switching the state, removing
the balance item and releasing mut_ex_op testnset lock.) Bring it back.
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 05:30:57PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
The mail did not make it to the list on Monday, anyway, now I have a
few testing results to share.
The umount responsiveness is much improved, it took a few seconds when
there were many roots to clean scheduled.
With
$ echo
This patch has been committed.
Thanks
--Rich
commit 52f4953ac4a377f9f7fc870d2a81f30c3e5d3c7f
Author: Eric Sandeen sand...@sandeen.net
Date: Tue Mar 5 22:41:54 2013 +
xfstests: Fix hang when mkfs.btrfs isn't present
My earlier patch (xfstests: handle new mkfs.btrfs -f option
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:01:09AM -0700, Liu Bo wrote:
Although we already have over commit stuff, btrfs write performance
still suffers from over reservation a lot.
I'm getting ready to rip all of the reservation code out and put in a ENOSPC log
for a buffer area for delalloc writes and
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 07:45:34PM -0700, Miao Xie wrote:
We re-queue the node just when there are some delayed items in the current
node.
But if the node still has delayed items after we deal with it, that is to say
someone is accessing the node. So it is better to release it and deal with
The superblock checksum is not verified upon mount. awkward silence
Add that check and also reorder existing checks to a more logical
order.
Current mkfs.btrfs does not calculate the correct checksum of
super_block and thus a freshly created filesytem will fail to mount when
this patch is
Allocate fs_info::super_copy dynamically of full BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE
and use it directly for saving superblock to disk.
This fixes incorrect superblock checksum after mkfs.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba dste...@suse.cz
---
this is based on master 704a08cb8a so it could be merged asap
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 11:08:57AM +0200, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 05:30:57PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
3407 BUG_ON(fs_info-balance_ctl ||
atomic_read(fs_info-balance_running));
Were you by any chance running this on top of a for-linus that included
a raid56
On 03/06/2013 07:56 AM, David Sterba wrote:
The superblock checksum is not verified upon mount. awkward silence
Add that check and also reorder existing checks to a more logical
order.
Current mkfs.btrfs does not calculate the correct checksum of
super_block and thus a freshly created
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 09:14:45AM -0800, Blair Zajac wrote:
On 03/06/2013 07:56 AM, David Sterba wrote:
/*
+ * Return 0 if the superblock checksum type matches the checksum value of
that
+ * alghorithm. Pass the raw disk superblock data.
I'm not familiar with the review policy on this
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 04:56:40PM +0100, David Sterba wrote:
The superblock checksum is not verified upon mount. awkward silence
Hah!
/*
+ * Return 0 if the superblock checksum type matches the checksum value of
that
+ * alghorithm. Pass the raw disk superblock data.
+ */
+static int
On wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:53:28 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 07:45:34PM -0700, Miao Xie wrote:
We re-queue the node just when there are some delayed items in the current
node.
But if the node still has delayed items after we deal with it, that is to say
someone is
On wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:53:28 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
[SNIP]
static int btrfs_wq_run_delayed_node(struct btrfs_delayed_root *delayed_root,
- struct btrfs_root *root, int all)
+ struct btrfs_root *root, int nr)
{
- struct
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 11:09:15AM -0700, David Sterba wrote:
On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 11:32:07PM +0200, Alex Lyakas wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 6:17 PM, David Sterba dste...@suse.cz wrote:
- btrfs_kill_all_delayed_nodes(root);
+ btrfs_kill_all_delayed_nodes(root);
On wed, 6 Mar 2013 22:06:50 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 06:39:30PM -0700, Miao Xie wrote:
On wed, 6 Mar 2013 09:53:28 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
[SNIP]
+ async_work-delayed_root = delayed_root;
+ async_work-work.func = btrfs_async_run_delayed_root;
+
15 matches
Mail list logo
